Misplaced Pages

Talk:Cessna 441 Conquest II: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 23:54, 30 June 2008 editTrevor MacInnis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users74,493 editsm complete B-class checklist, 3/5, assess as C-class.← Previous edit Revision as of 00:47, 6 April 2013 edit undoThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,902 editsm The Bushranger moved page Talk:Cessna 441 to Talk:Cessna 441 Conquest II: including model name per updated WP:AIR naming standardsNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:47, 6 April 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cessna 441 Conquest II article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Someone dumped the following text regarding a Cessna release after the specs, and with non-encyclopedic form. A brief, one-line summary is all that really needs to be added to the article. AKRadecki 12:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

24 August 2007 - Cessna Conquest grounded!
Cessna Directive Affects Planes With Over 22,500 Hours Australia's Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) announced Monday operators of Cessna 441 Conquest turboprops have been directed to follow a new manufacturer's life limit on the aircraft type.
Cessna has announced there is an unconditional life limit of 22,500 flying hours on the Cessna Conquest. The manufacturer says it cannot assure the continued safety of the aircraft after the limit is reached.The potential defect is reportedly in the rear pressure dome, and could lead to inflight structural failure near the empennage.'It's unfortunate and not something we wanted to do, but in the interest of the safety of people flying on these aircraft we thought we didn't have any choice,' CASA Spokesman Peter Gibson told The Age. CASA's direction means that all Australian Conquests that have reached 22,500 hours must be grounded. Aircraft with less than 22,500 flying hours may continue to operate normally. Cessna imposed the life limit after reviewing its structural maintenance program for the aircraft and determining that structural problems are likely to develop if the aircraft continues to operate. A structural maintenance program is in place to manage the safety of the aircraft up to the 22,500 life limit. CASA's direction to ground the aircraft will be place for one year. During this time avenues will be explored that could extend the safe operation of the Conquest beyond the current life limit. The direction to ground Conquests with more than 22,500 flying hours came into effect August 24.

Drug Traffickers

Yahoo news article about use of aircraft for the South America to Africa hop of the cocaine route to Europe.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080205/ts_nm/usa_drugs_aircraft_dc;_ylt=Ag5C8h_GbWJBtTTYaF6._RVg.3QA

Hcobb (talk) 11:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Cessna 441 Conquest II: Difference between revisions Add topic