| Revision as of 03:01, 9 June 2013 editAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators233,239 edits Reverted to revision 558997357 by Acroterion: this is not a soapbox for your views on Misplaced Pages editors. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:01, 9 June 2013 edit undo108.41.179.235 (talk) →ANTHONYNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 02:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. '''<font face="Arial">] <small>]</small></font>''' 02:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| Tree-hugging liberal pansies use dispicable tactics to brainwash wiki readers to lean to the left by excluding key information about the scandals surrounding Obama. Also, they add false information to the GWB impeachment article. | |||
Revision as of 03:01, 9 June 2013
Let's discuss the materials that you would like to add to or remove from Efforts to impeach Barack Obama on that article's talk page. Cheers! bd2412 T 01:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Efforts to impeach Barack Obama. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. TMCk (talk) 02:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
...and this is just the main point of of several of what is wrong with your disruptive editwarring that will lead to a block if you continue.TMCk (talk) 02:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Efforts to impeach Barack Obama. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
ANTHONY
I am getting NO responses on the talk page. Also, the GWB impeachment page is LOADED with unreferenced false claims, yet I get warning for posting accurate claims WITH references.
- There is a thread active to discuss the sections you are reverting. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 02:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Tree-hugging liberal pansies use dispicable tactics to brainwash wiki readers to lean to the left by excluding key information about the scandals surrounding Obama. Also, they add false information to the GWB impeachment article.