Misplaced Pages

User talk:Monterrosa: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:22, 20 June 2013 editLady Lotus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,138 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:34, 21 June 2013 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,240 edits Long-term warring at Seth McFarlane and possible block: new sectionNext edit →
Line 89: Line 89:
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you.

== Long-term warring at ] and possible block ==

See this complaint at the 3RR noticeboard: ]

Basically, this is a long-term war where you keep restoring rowspans to the article and you keep breaking out the 'various voices' parts into all the individual voices. You are not waiting to get agreement on this. In fact, it appears you are not listening to anyone. You've never posted on the article talk page. You've been blocked in the past for as long as one month, but it doesn't seem to lead to any improvement. If you continue the war at ] an admin may decide to block you indefinitely from Misplaced Pages. Thank you, ] (]) 14:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 21 June 2013

Monterrosa, you are invited to the Teahouse

[REDACTED]

Hi Monterrosa! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Unsourced material in biographical articles

Hi. Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to Gabriel Iglesias, as we really appreciate your participation. However, material regarding Iglesias' personal life and influences had to be reverted, because Misplaced Pages cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Misplaced Pages requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with your edits to Trey Parker and Matt Stone. If you would like to add such information, please make sure it is accompanied by citations of reliable secondary sources, as I explained above. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's No Original Research, Verifiability or Reliable Sources policies by adding unsourced material to articles, as you did with your edits to Gabriel Iglesias and Stan Lee, you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 20:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent addition of unsourced material to BLP articles, and ignoring repeated warnings, the most recent violation being this edit to Stan Lee. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nightscream (talk) 12:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm MaskedHero. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Justin Bieber with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, MaskedHero (talk) 00:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Monterrosa, please stop your disruptive edits. If you continue edit disruptively, as you did when you again added unsourced material to the Stan Lee article, and removed content without providing a rationale from the Justin Bieber article, as mentioned above, you risk being blocked for longer periods of time. I really would rather not do that, since it appears that you are capable of making valid edits, but your non-constructive edits, and your lack of communication with others who attempt to speak with you on your talk page may result in more blocks. Please do not make that necessary. I'm here if you have any questions or need help. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent addition of unsourced material to BLP articles, and ignoring repeated warnings and a past block, the most recent violations being the following edits to Matt Stone and Trey Parker. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nightscream (talk) 21:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Conan O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Producer
Daniel Tosh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Producer
Matt Stone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Primus
Stan Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Producer
Trey Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Primus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced material to articles, as you did with the passage regarding Matt Stone's collaboration with Les Claypool during this edit to the Matt Stone article. While I appreciate the other sourced material you added, if you continue to add material without citations, you risk being blocked from editing again. Please do not make that necessary. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 03:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent addition of unsourced material to BLP articles, and ignoring repeated warnings and two past blocks for the same offense, the most recent violation being this edit to Gabriel Iglesias. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Nightscream (talk) 03:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabriel Iglesias Presents Stand Up Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stand up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Gabriel Iglesias

Hi. What was wrong with the Comedy Central's Stand Up Picks - Part 3 listing that you removed in your last edit? Is that information incorrect? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 04:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I have reverted your removal of material from the article, because you did not provide a rationale in an edit summary, and have chosen to ignore my attempt to ask you about it above, inasmuch as you have continued editing since I left i, without any response to it.

When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Please do not remove material without providing edit summaries, since doing so might be construed as disruptive editing, for which you have already been blocked before. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent addition of unsourced material to BLP articles, and ignoring repeated warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jauerback/dude. 05:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Rowspans

Monterrosa, we do not use rowspans - it affects WP:Accessibility. Please refrain from using them, like in your edits to Seth McFarlane. Thank you. Lady Lotus (talk) 17:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Seth McFarlan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. On top of disruptive editing, and what I will now consider vandalism, you are now pushing an edit war because of your revision of 3 or more edits after more told why your edits are being reverted. I have already told you about rowspans - it affects WP:Accessibility, anyone who is hearing impaired or vision impaired with a screenreader cannot properly have the filmography read to them when they have rowspans. Other editors and myself are trying diligently to remove rowspans from article pages for this reason while "editors" like you keep putting them back. Please refrain from further edits like this or you will be blocked. Lady Lotus (talk) 22:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Lady Lotus (talk) 22:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeremy Jahns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Jahns is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Jahns until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lady Lotus (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Monterrosa reported by User:Lady Lotus (Result: ). Thank you. Lady Lotus (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Long-term warring at Seth McFarlane and possible block

See this complaint at the 3RR noticeboard: WP:AN3#User:Monterrosa reported by User:Lady Lotus (Result: )

Basically, this is a long-term war where you keep restoring rowspans to the article and you keep breaking out the 'various voices' parts into all the individual voices. You are not waiting to get agreement on this. In fact, it appears you are not listening to anyone. You've never posted on the article talk page. You've been blocked in the past for as long as one month, but it doesn't seem to lead to any improvement. If you continue the war at Seth McFarlane an admin may decide to block you indefinitely from Misplaced Pages. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Monterrosa: Difference between revisions Add topic