| Revision as of 03:40, 20 July 2013 editWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users663,056 edits →Helfer's book: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:43, 20 July 2013 edit undoWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users663,056 edits →Helfer's bookNext edit → | ||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
| == Helfer's book == | == Helfer's book == | ||
| The "style" of a book should not necessarily be an impediment to it being a reliable source. The publisher is MacMillan, according to . ] should be a good publisher so Helfer's book should be treated as an RS. Also, I'm sure this information is also available in other sources. | Regarding ]: The "style" of a book should not necessarily be an impediment to it being a reliable source. The publisher is MacMillan, according to . ] should be a good publisher so Helfer's book should be treated as an RS. Also, I'm sure this information is also available in other sources. | ||
| ] (]) 03:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) | ] (]) 03:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:43, 20 July 2013
 |
|
 | Are you here because I deleted your article? Please read this before you leave me a message. |
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
question
Is there some reason 2009 flu pandemic doesn't have a 'move' button? I looked at the talk page but didn't see any history of ArbCom or other mediation. Malke 2010 (talk) 04:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Because of its history of vandalism, the page was move-protected so that only admins can move it. If you want to move it, I recommend starting a discussion. See the instructions at WP:RM/CM. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 01:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- I was more curious than wanting to move it. I'd never seen that before. Thanks for the info. Malke 2010 (talk) 02:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
appreciate your advice and expertise
It appears you deleted the wiki-pedia article about me. Please read the LA Times Article written about me that was carried around the world in more than 25 other major news organizations:
Please review the imdb.com site about me:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1999597/bio
Here is my resume:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1999597/resume
Feel free to write an appropriate wiki-pedia article about me as it seems whatever is submitted by anyone seems to be deleted for reasons no one can understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.25.113 (talk) 12:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hello. There was no Misplaced Pages article about you. There was a user page on which somebody had created an overly promotional page about you. It turns out that page was copied and pasted from imbd.com in violation of copyright law.
- If you think you merit an encyclopedia article, try listing yourself at WP:Requested articles. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hadi Rishi Esfahani
About a year ago, you G4'd Hadi Rishi Esfahani twice. The article has been recreated, and as far as I can tell the article still fails the same notability guidelines as a year ago. Unfortunately, I can't find the original discussion. It seems to have used a different spelling of his name. Could you delete the article and/or tell me where to find the original discussion? Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. The original discussion was at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Iman Kiani. I've deleted and salted the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 01:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
You've Deleted the page for citing copyright violation
http://en.wikipedia.org/Biogerontology_Research_Foundation We do not know how to edit Misplaced Pages and apologize for this post if it violates any of the policies. The page was deleted citing copyright violation. The Foundation is a registered UK charity supporting aging research worldwide and acting as a think tank. It regularly supports conferences and research supported by the foundation was featured in Cell, PLoS and other journals. Please reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.140.235.170 (talk) 06:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages cannot accept material that belongs to another website. It violates copyright law. See WP:Copyright violations.
- If you own the material and wish to contribute it to Misplaced Pages, please follow the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Deletion review for Muhammad Agung Pribadi
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Muhammad Agung Pribadi. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MbahGondrong (talk • contribs) 17:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notification, but I don't have anything to say. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 02:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
- Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case opens; July 22 deadline for checkuser and oversight applications
Template:Hindu Nationalism
Hi there! Since you're an admin so could you please, check the claim by an editor User:Linguisticgeek that the template Hindu Nationalism is a duplicate of template Sangh Parivar? Thanks, --Benfold (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Benfold. While there appears to be a great deal of overlap between the two templates, they are not exact duplicates of one another. You might want to consider merging them, or clarifying how they differ from one another.
- Also, please do not edit war over a speedy deletion tag. Instead, explain your viewpoint on the template's Talk page. An administrator will review the Talk page before considering speedy deletion. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 01:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
24.224.214.165
I regret to inform you that 24.224.214.165 has, in your words, "purposefully and blatantly harass" me once again. --GHcool (talk) 00:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. The IP has been blocked. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 01:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Helfer's book
Regarding Malcolm X: The "style" of a book should not necessarily be an impediment to it being a reliable source. The publisher is MacMillan, according to this page. MacMillan should be a good publisher so Helfer's book should be treated as an RS. Also, I'm sure this information is also available in other sources. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)