| Revision as of 04:33, 5 October 2013 edit69.249.184.7 (talk) Undid revision 575758744 by Prashant! (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:34, 5 October 2013 edit undoKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits Undid revision 575819476 by 69.249.184.7 (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| {{GOCEtb|article=Aitraaz|sign= ]] 17:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)}} | {{GOCEtb|article=Aitraaz|sign= ]] 17:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)}} | ||
| == Failure == | |||
| What a pathetic little boy you are. If it failed (which as Rambling Man said it hasn't anyway) it wasn't because of anything I did. There's absolutely no way he'd have passed it with the tone like that and all of the people who supported stated that my version was better. It wasn't anything about proving who was better, you're hardly a "rival" are you. It was purely about trying to help you out and promote it. Given how much it changed during the nomination then it would be difficult to really clarify who supports what anyway. You've proved yourself to be the most insufferable of people on wikipedia. Never post on my talk page again. Given your track record of behaviour with editors at FAC, I think its high time you were banned from ever nominating or posting there again.♦ ] 11:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : That is harsh and uncivil, Dr. Blofeld. You could have said what you needed to say without the name-calling. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 11:11, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Harsh, really? I suppose ] you don't think that his posts and were not in the lightest bit childish. Considering how he's behaved, the natural reaction would be to say something far worse Liz. He ''is'' a pathetic little boy who is far too immature to be involved in FAC and to edit[REDACTED] as a whole in all honesty.♦ ] 11:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| I can't say about other's opinion, as I always says truth. You can call me a pathetic boy. It doesn't matter. You were and are trying to show that you are the main contributor of that flc and I don't want your help anymore. Today I lost that friend also. It's a big loss for me.—] 12:03, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Prashant I couldn't give a damn about being the "main contributor of the FLC". If I wanted self-glorification I'd hardly select a filmography of an Indian actress as a way to do so would I? You're clearly the main contributor to it and deserve the most credit. However as Rambling said, serious issues with tone were preventing him from supporting. I asked the others to see if they supported the cruft or not the cruft and they opted for the latter. The article is still largely written by you so what does it matter? I merely made the edits which I thought would help it pass but what you've now done has completely jeopardized the nom and your future success on here. Rambling Man didn't even fail it. It's yet another blunder by you and this is the final straw towards getting you banned from ever again being involved in the FA process. you lack the mentality to understand that everything isn't a personal game but some editors genuinely want to try to help others succeed. If you tot up the sum of what you've done around FA/FLC you not only deserve for this nom to fail based on your behaviour but to be permanently banned as a contributor to the process. You can't act this way and get away with it. ♦ ] 12:11, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| He didn't failed?? He said he want a re-nomination. What does it mean? And by the way I didn't said anything about the flc but what I thought because it costs my flc. Also, I may sound childish but, that time when I saw that re-nom, I got angry and posted those messages. Because my work of 3 month was gone in vain. I nominated it in August when I was leaving for my university and now even I gave my mid-semester, the article has not passed. What should I assume. Because of all those unwanted discussion. I know I reacted like pressure cooker but, I wrote what I feel as I'm dealing with very high pressures these days due to my studies. Checking each day Misplaced Pages is very hard and if im a nominator, i have to to address others comments. It was heartbreaking to see that. I don't have an agenda against you.—] 12:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 5 October 2013
Leave me a message | Send me an e-mail.
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Film Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
GOCE requests
Your requests will get done faster if you don't ask for a particular copyeditor; for example, I'm working on other things and probably won't have time for requests until next month. If you have trouble at GA and FA, chances are it's for a reason other than the copyedit. All the best, Miniapolis 19:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Kaminey
 | Hi Krish!, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Kaminey. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kaminey at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Plot section reduced to around 850 words. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:26, 24 September 2013 (UTC) |
Fashion (film)
| Hi Krish!, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Fashion (film). Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Fashion (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers,Baffle gab1978 (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC) |
Aitraaz
| Hello, Krish!. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Aitraaz at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 17:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC) |