| Revision as of 10:23, 15 October 2013 editBracketBot (talk | contribs)173,351 edits Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:26, 15 October 2013 edit undoNomoskedasticity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,770 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Haredi Judaism. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
| so were the council of Torah sages of ] were called in the past '''Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah''' (like in ]) or were they called or still called '''Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah'''? this is important because I put a note at the top of the article of ]... ?? --] (]) 21:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC) | so were the council of Torah sages of ] were called in the past '''Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah''' (like in ]) or were they called or still called '''Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah'''? this is important because I put a note at the top of the article of ]... ?? --] (]) 21:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 15 October 2013
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Mass changes at Israeli settlement articles
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
hello
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Good Article promotion
|
Congratulations! |
| Thanks for all the work you did in making Tefillin a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated. All the best, – Quadell |
Notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Chesdovi_and_Palestinian_edits regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Chesdovi! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Notes
Balady citron, New Jewish Cemetery, Kraków, Moshe Zvi Segal, Abraham Sternhartz, Eliyahu Chaim Rosen, Shlomo Yosef Zevin
Happy Chanukah Chesdovi!
 |  |
File:Joseph H. Hertz.JPG
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Haredi Judaism". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 05:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Photo of Yeshivas Brisk
Hi, I'm glad you can use the picture. You can attribute it to "Yoninah". Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ovadia Yosef may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
| List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨) |
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Haredi Judaism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
| List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨) |
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Shas Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah
Hi Chesdovi,
I have just created the article Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah on Shas council of Torah sages. At the same time, I read on Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah#In the United States that the moetzes of Agudath Israel of America used to be called by the same name in the past, but I counldn't find any mention of that on Agudath Israel of America article, which calls the council Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah or simly Moetzes.
so were the council of Torah sages of Agudath Israel of America were called in the past Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah (like in Shas) or were they called or still called Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah? this is important because I put a note at the top of the article of Moetzet Chachmei HaTorah... ?? --Midrashah (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Haredi Judaism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)