| Revision as of 04:26, 16 October 2013 editTheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,391 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:52, 16 October 2013 edit undoSalvidrim! (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors28,655 edits →16 October 2013: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| *@Mark Arsten & Salvidrim!. If you will look at ] you will see the same arguments being made by each of the editors, using the same verbiage and style of writing. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 04:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | *@Mark Arsten & Salvidrim!. If you will look at ] you will see the same arguments being made by each of the editors, using the same verbiage and style of writing. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">] ]</span> 04:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :*And it is '''''evidently''''' impossible for like-minded editors to express similar opinions. <span style="13px Sylfaen;color:white;background-color:#000000;padding:0 3px 0 3px;">☺ · ] · ]</span> 04:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 16 October 2013
Niemti
Niemti (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Niemti/Archive.
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Niemti from SNAAAAKE!! (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
16 October 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Niemti (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Student7 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheTimesAreAChanging (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 88.104.219.76 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
All 4 editors have worked on Genocides in history, all promoting the same evidence and using the same verbiage. It's funny that none of them ever edit at the same time however. One editor will be editing, then another will edit. See & where each editor picks up where the other one dropped off, with no change in the argument. See also & where Niemti reverts an edit, an IP restores it, and then TTAAC shows up out of nowhere to revert the same edit 3 times. GregJackP Boomer! 02:11, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- @Mark Arsten & Salvidrim!. If you will look at Talk:Genocides in history you will see the same arguments being made by each of the editors, using the same verbiage and style of writing. GregJackP Boomer! 04:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- And it is evidently impossible for like-minded editors to express similar opinions. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 04:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Since User:Skizzik also reverted that blatant POV-push on Highway of Death, after I exhausted my three reverts, that makes him part of the conspiracy too--right? You're way off the mark on this one: The IP is obviously User:Stumink!TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- GregJacksonP, all four of us have drastically different writing styles (except possibly Niemti, who I don't really know so can't comment on).TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 04:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I'm inclined to say no check needs to be made here. Behaviorally these accounts seem very different. I'd be very surprised if they were being controlled by the same individual. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- I would tend to agree. I'm behaviourally closer to some of my close wiki-colleagues than these three accounts are. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Categories: