Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:36, 19 October 2013

Welcome!

I delete useless things on my talk page from time to time... Since I'm too lazy to learn how to use auto archive, You go check here for old things...

Edit War history

There used to be someone very very rude，who'd address himself alone as we and us.

That person had some conflicts with me, and send me to this ANI. Of course I did nothing wrong, but this person managed to write a lot! Accusing me with tons of things...
In the end, this person got a Indefinite block, by the wiki admin judgement.
Today, I really think (meaning no proof), that those "non-wiki admin, non-related" people who joined the 2 ANI events are one of this person's sock puppets.
Today, I thought not to delete this memory...BECAUSE,
I learned the importance of never delete ones calumniate while adding my response! --B3430715 (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

== Columbo ==

I will make no more edits on this article before this person is done with his massive unplanned changes.

I will not work with SB who does what so ever on his will without agreements.User:B3430715

== ANI ==

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• Response

Clearly, no body is at the mediation.

Clearly, the mediation is dead.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy himself withdrawn mediation and begins his edit on the article.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy is only there because I pointed out his error.

Clearly, he and I are the only two there.

Clearly, Djathinkimacowboy ain't reading my words while replying me.

Tell me, who does he mean by us (he and I ?), and had he talked to the other mediation members yet? B3430715 (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

• Response II

I'm not sure why would someone keeps scaring me with things such as "i will report to so and so"

I'm not sure why would someone keeps claiming himself as "we" when there's only "him" and "I"

I certainly knows about this "history" function that stores old pages. So why would someone thought of "deleted the evidence"....

It's my talk page, and i can keep it clean and light can i?

B3430715 (talk) 07:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I've reviewed the AN/I discussion, and your recent edits, B3430715. My own view is that there is no admin action necessary right now, but I would suggest that you slow down a little and learn some of the conventions here at Misplaced Pages. I'm guessing that English is not your first language by edits such as this one. That's no problem, but it does mean that trying to make jokes, or be ironic, is going to be hard to do effectively and I'd recommend that you don't try. Keep your sentences in articles and talk pages simple, clear and direct. Your responses above were not in the right place (if anywhere, they belonged at AN/I) and were not really a helpful addition to the argument. Please assume good faith on the part of other editors and try to work collaboratively with them, even if you disagree with them. You do need to do a bit of work to understand some of our processes here, which are difficult enough to understand when your first language is English! So don't be impatient with others, but ask for help if you think something is not happening as it should. Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown 19:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Judge Dee

Good move. I've edited that article and it hadn't occurred to me, but you're right it is about the various stories, not about either the fictional character himself (to any great extent) or the real judge. Since the article links to the article about the real "Judge Dee", there shouldn't be any need for further disambiguation. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 11:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Columbo Broadcast history

You, of course, can delete this section on Columbo broadcast history. But I just wanted to let you know in all fairness that if you don't respond to the concerns on the article's talk page, I may delete large portions of that article for being unreferenced. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Monkey fight

My second edit war on Misplaced Pages. Ended up with me requesting a 3rd person to provide 3rd opinion to end my nightmare. While I violated WP:ELNO, at lest better then the one that violated WP:SOURCE, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL, WP:GNG, WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:IRS ...--B3430715 (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Xiaomi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

No, you did/admitted an original research! --B3430715 (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Xiaomi, you may be blocked from editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Based upon your edit here where you continue to add your own independent original research. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

It is my last warning? what about yours? last chance for changing your bias opinion? To error is human, but dictatorship over a bias opinion on[REDACTED] is unforgivable!

NO! This is your last warning as well. ConcernedVancouverite, the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's NPOV policy by reverting/supporting/adding bias point of view into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice as well.--B3430715 (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on iOS 7. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits give undue weight to an otherwise minority viewpoint which claims that iOS 7 rips off MIUI. I'm being especially cautious about your editing practices because the majority of them have been on MIUI-related pages. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)