Revision as of 22:12, 10 June 2006 editDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits →confirmation: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:27, 10 June 2006 edit undoClever curmudgeon (talk | contribs)216 edits User:Clever curmudgeonNext edit → | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
Thank you for your confirmation on ]. ] 22:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | Thank you for your confirmation on ]. ] 22:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
:No problem. If I can help further, give me a shout. --] <sup>]</sup> 22:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | :No problem. If I can help further, give me a shout. --] <sup>]</sup> 22:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
You have editted my user page to remove an image on two seperate occasions, do not touch my user page again. ] 22:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:27, 10 June 2006
Deskana's Talk Page
|
user page
aha i see what i did, i thought i was on MY "user page" and not the general user page for the whole site. when someone clicks their own name, it says "Misplaced Pages does not have a user page with this exact name" and user page is a link that implies it goes to one's user page, but really it goes to a generic user page for the whole site. that's rather confusing... sorry
- OK, responding on your talk page per the notice at the top of this page. --Lord Deskana 22:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for Jesus
Odd title..but thanks for doing something to stop the vandalism on the Jesus page. That was getting out of hand. haha Lsjzl 17:30, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- I mean, my addition of the sprotected tag was reverted to get rid of vandalism. That was just totally out of control. You're welcome for Jesus. :-p --Lord Deskana 17:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Reply on another page
You said: How very nitpicky of you. It's changing the content of an article in a major way, therefore a major edit. Whether or not it was a revert or not is irrelevant. This comment is not an endorsement of any edits to this article. --Lord Deskana
- I have replied to you on http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:SOPHIA. You did not understand the issues. Not sure why you felt the need to attack me... given that I obeyed your rule and did not attack you. Perhaps you felt that I was unkind to Sophia, who has since admitted that her revert had nothing to do with the discussion requiring concensus. --72.13.168.149 21:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is a lot of wikilawyering for a "new" user - huh? Sophia 21:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Did I claim to be a new user? Why are you making accusations? Do you think I have been mean to you somehow?--72.13.168.149 21:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Exams
Images
Regarding your recent block...I'm considering speedying those images. What are your thoughts? --HappyCamper 19:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ah... go for it. They're so totally unencylopedic that I don't think it's necessary to put them through IfD. We already know what everyone's going to say. Delete. --Lord Deskana 19:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Done for just the two. I'll go to IFD and tie up the loose ends. --HappyCamper 19:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Great stuff! --Lord Deskana 19:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair Use Pics
Yea so I took those pictures myself, and I don't know how to fix the problem, especially since I don't see one. Thankyoubaby 22:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- I will explain in the morning... I'm exhauted. We have seven days so there's no rush. :-) --Lord Deskana 23:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, I figured it our myself. Thankyoubaby 01:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair huh?
See note at my talk- also, what is "further mathematics"? Staecker 00:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Real maths - not the wimpy everyday stuff but mind boggling integrals/quadratic equations/linear regression/proof by induction etc. He's not a Dark Lord of the Sith for nothing - only the chosen few get 2 A' levels in maths - usually those with no social life! BTW Dan - good luck with the rest of the exams. Sophia 00:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Things like "conjugate complex roots to polynomial equations with real coefficients" and other fancy sounding things. Scarily, I know what that means. --Lord Deskana 13:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Once you turn to the Dark Side there is no going back....... Sophia 14:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
OK thanks- and welcome to the dark side. More on my talk about fair use. Staecker 18:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Note
A note. Mackensen (talk) 13:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I lose! :-p --Lord Deskana 13:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Deleted Page
Deskana, thanks for your message.
The Page was SmartCode Corp. - there are many articles about them and they ARE Notable according to WP:CORP
RFID Journal (a Very crediable source in the industry):
http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2296/ https://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2295/1/2/ http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/2250/1/1/ http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/670/1/1/ http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1869/1/1/
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/05/22/rfid.retail.ap/index.html
Information week http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=54201330
Network World http://www.networkworld.com/weblogs/applications/011968.html
DC Velocity http://www.dcvelocity.com/articles/rfidww/rfidww20060503/rfid_5centtags.cfm
RFID Gazzete: http://www.rfidgazette.org/2004/11/index.html
I want to update the page, but someone keeps deleting it.
Thanks, SC Web 17:23, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, but recreation is out of the question. See Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/SMARTCODE CORP. (2nd nomination). As the debate has already been carried out, any recreations of the articles will be speedy deleted as recreation of deleted content. --Lord Deskana 17:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, how do we argue that the page is indedd Notable? (it is under WP:CORP) I really think it should be brought back. Stx2090 18:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- First, answer me the following questions, please.
- Do you have two accounts, perhaps even three (User:SC Web, User:Stx2090, User:SMARTCODE)? Multiple accounts are not prohibited but are discouraged.
- What exactly is your affiliation with the company?
- --Lord Deskana 18:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
1. Yes - thought you can have several names 2. I'm a customer of theirs - I saw the RFID page and wanted to add them. They're really one of the biggest in the space. Stx2090 19:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
confirmation
Thank you for your confirmation on Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Raphael1/Evidence. Raphael1 22:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. If I can help further, give me a shout. --Lord Deskana 22:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
User:Clever curmudgeon
You have editted my user page to remove an image on two seperate occasions, do not touch my user page again. Clever curmudgeon 22:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)