Revision as of 12:37, 30 November 2013 editNumber 57 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators293,605 edits WP:NPA again← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:45, 30 November 2013 edit undoVanished user llkdfkj4isw4 (talk | contribs)9,402 edits remove creepy messagesNext edit → | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
: I take great pride in the fact that for a while, the quality of women's national football team articles was better than the men's. It is good to see these articles worked on. (I've actually been learning a bit about blind football recently. I really wish they had a women's version because fun game to watch.) On the other front, New Zealand is probably next. The current article titles fail ] because two teams exist and the rules are gender segregated. The Pillars of Misplaced Pages still apply. Anyway, please do keep up the good work. :) --] (]) 21:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | : I take great pride in the fact that for a while, the quality of women's national football team articles was better than the men's. It is good to see these articles worked on. (I've actually been learning a bit about blind football recently. I really wish they had a women's version because fun game to watch.) On the other front, New Zealand is probably next. The current article titles fail ] because two teams exist and the rules are gender segregated. The Pillars of Misplaced Pages still apply. Anyway, please do keep up the good work. :) --] (]) 21:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
== NPA == | |||
While I know you have your issues with ] due to perceived gender bias, I would really appreciate if you avoided comments like . It's not the first time you've accused members of that WikiProject (myself included) as chauvinists and pathetic or engaging in circle jerks, but I would hope it is the last. Regards, ]] 18:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:No, you are clearly attacking the members of the Project. Your attitude to my post is disappointing but not unexpected. ]] 20:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | ||
] | ] | ||
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | ||
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 01:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 01:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
==Circle jerk comments again== | |||
I see you have made the same crude sexual reference on the Australia discussion. Despite your claim that it is not , can I draw your attention to ], specifically the line that says that a personal attack is defined as | |||
:"Racial, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, ageist, religious, political, ethnic, national, <span style="color:red;">sexual, or other epithets</span> (such as against people with disabilities) directed against another contributor, or <span style="color:red;">against a group of contributors.</span>" | |||
Next time I see this, or if you still refuse to accept there is a problem with your comments, there will be an ANI report. There's no need to resort to being so horrible in a discussion, even when it's not going your way ] ]] 12:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:45, 30 November 2013
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Good Article promotion
Congratulations! | |
Thanks for all the work you did in making Katie Chapman a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated.
In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell |
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Vanished user llkdfkj4isw4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Welcome on WikiProject Women's sport
Genevieve has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}
Rangers FC Dispute
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Esther Hernández may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Spain-footy-bio-stub}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, BB! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rachel Williams (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Rachel Williams joins Chelsea|publisher=[[She Kicks (magazine)|accessdate=6 November 2013|date=6 November 2013}}</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elisabetta Bavagnoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hometown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
License tagging for File:AGSM-Verona.png
Thanks for uploading File:AGSM-Verona.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Glasgow City L.F.C. players
Category:Glasgow City L.F.C. players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. NSH002 (talk) 23:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note at CfD. I only got involved because I chanced on this article in the printed version of The Independent (the pic in the online piece is not the same as the one in the printed edition, which actually shows some players of the club, not the opposition, and which also has a pic of Montgomery). It piqued my interest because I'd just read and watched Chrissie's evidence to the select committee inquiry on Women and Sport. See the links in the "Further reading" section at Chrissie Wellington - a pretty thorough demolishing of some of the attitudes you see in comments on the Independent piece - even ignoring the fact that she beats most of the men in her races. A strange fact: she is, by any objective set of criteria, one of the most outstanding athletes in any sport, of any era, of any gender, and yet she gets hardly any coverage. That reflects more on the media than it does on her achievements. Anyway, after reading the Independent, I tried to find the club on Misplaced Pages - not straightforward! I did think of pointing Glasgow City at the club, but settled, for now, for just putting a hatnote on Glasgow. BTW, I did grow up in that part of the world, though I am not Scottish. --NSH001 (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Portal
Would you be interested in helping me create and curate the portal? Hmlarson (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Quick word of thanks for your work developing further the Hólmbert Aron Friðjónsson article, great work finding those Icelandic refs. I know it is likely to be deleted in a few days, but at least we've kept it interesting for the 2000+ people who have viewed it so far this week :) --nonsense ferret 23:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
The support comment made my day. :D Beyond that, thank you for all the work you're doing on women's football/soccer articles. It is very much appreciated. :D
LauraHale (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- I take great pride in the fact that for a while, the quality of women's national football team articles was better than the men's. It is good to see these articles worked on. (I've actually been learning a bit about blind football recently. I really wish they had a women's version because fun game to watch.) On the other front, New Zealand is probably next. The current article titles fail WP:V because two teams exist and the rules are gender segregated. The Pillars of Misplaced Pages still apply. Anyway, please do keep up the good work. :) --LauraHale (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Australia national association football team". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 01:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)