Revision as of 20:02, 18 May 2002 editStephen Gilbert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,700 edits passed the Google test← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:01, 13 January 2003 edit undoFirebirth (talk | contribs)103 edits Should I start tidying this "propaganda" up?Next edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Well, it passed the ] test, but it still needs to be largely rewritten. --] | Well, it passed the ] test, but it still needs to be largely rewritten. --] | ||
Why is there registered trademark signs? - I haven't seen them any other place in Misplaced Pages! - Since for instance Windows doesn't bear them in articles wouldn't it be fair enough to remove them? - And it still doesn't seem very explanatory, everywhere it just says "research tells...", not referring to any articles or anything. - Would it be okay, if I made a stub on this on top of the old text? - So that we eventually could get rid of this brochure thing? -- ] |
Revision as of 18:01, 13 January 2003
Aside from the fact that this article isn't very NPOV, there needs to be something in it that tells what TM is.
- I'm also still concerned that, since it reads so much like a promotional brochure, it may be under copyright. Vicki Rosenzweig
Well, it passed the Google test, but it still needs to be largely rewritten. --Stephen Gilbert
Why is there registered trademark signs? - I haven't seen them any other place in Misplaced Pages! - Since for instance Windows doesn't bear them in articles wouldn't it be fair enough to remove them? - And it still doesn't seem very explanatory, everywhere it just says "research tells...", not referring to any articles or anything. - Would it be okay, if I made a stub on this on top of the old text? - So that we eventually could get rid of this brochure thing? -- Firebirth