Revision as of 22:30, 3 December 2013 editBroWCarey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users537 edits →Need specifics: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:40, 3 December 2013 edit undoRoccodrift (talk | contribs)682 edits →Need specifics: WP:V is the standard, and those sources failNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
As for sources, they are what they are. The two listed are widely used by LGBT-affirming Pentecostals. There are other sources, but they are less widely used by Pentecostals. So the sources may not be the best, but they are what is available for now, and are sources used by these churches. (APCI includes a link to one of them on their website.) Were LGBT-affirming Pentecostals a large market, we would undoubtedly see better resources from known publishing companies. But they are not. But self-publishing isn't automatically a disqualifier. The book cited, while self-published, was copyright by Lighthouse Ministries, which has been publishing tracts and booklets for the affirming Pentecostal community since the early 1980's. ] (]) 22:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | As for sources, they are what they are. The two listed are widely used by LGBT-affirming Pentecostals. There are other sources, but they are less widely used by Pentecostals. So the sources may not be the best, but they are what is available for now, and are sources used by these churches. (APCI includes a link to one of them on their website.) Were LGBT-affirming Pentecostals a large market, we would undoubtedly see better resources from known publishing companies. But they are not. But self-publishing isn't automatically a disqualifier. The book cited, while self-published, was copyright by Lighthouse Ministries, which has been publishing tracts and booklets for the affirming Pentecostal community since the early 1980's. ] (]) 22:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Trying to infer Pentecostalism by reading between the lines in a statement of faith is naked original research. You may or may not be correct, it doesn't matter. You need a source, not your own reasoning. | |||
::Self-published sources are only usable under narrow circumstances, per ]. If you can demonstrate that Carey is a recognized authority whose views have been published by third parties with editorial oversight, I'm all ears. Failing that, he doesn't clear WP:V. And I sincerely hope that you don't plan to vigorously defend that "Hope Remains" website. You simply don't have any chance at all of showing it meets Misplaced Pages standards. ] (]) 22:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:40, 3 December 2013
Welcome!
Hello, Roccodrift, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SlutWalk. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Auric talk 12:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Sock-puppet?
Your editing is precocious - see WP: PEH. Why? Hyper3 (talk) 11:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Need specifics
In editing List of Christian Denominational Positions on Homosexuality, re: Pentecostal Churches, you wrote: "These are not Pentecostal Churches, according to their own websites. Needs a better source or these have to come out." Can you be specific? Which churches do you believe are not Pentecostal? Although some of their websites may not use the word Pentecostal, there are other indications that they are. For example, the AAIM website states: "The baptisms of Water and Spirit are promises for all believers." The baptism of the Spirit tends to be unique to Pentecostal and Charismatic churches. Anthem Phoenix, while I strongly disagree with most of their theology, mentions " We believe Jesus Christ sends the Holy Spirit to dwell in the hearts of believers, empowers them with gifts, convicts, guides, comforts, counsels, and leads us into truth through a communal life of worship and a missional expression of our faith." Mention of the gifts tends to suggest a Pentecostal or Charismatic group. The New Covenant Church likewise indicates a believe in Spirit baptism.
As for sources, they are what they are. The two listed are widely used by LGBT-affirming Pentecostals. There are other sources, but they are less widely used by Pentecostals. So the sources may not be the best, but they are what is available for now, and are sources used by these churches. (APCI includes a link to one of them on their website.) Were LGBT-affirming Pentecostals a large market, we would undoubtedly see better resources from known publishing companies. But they are not. But self-publishing isn't automatically a disqualifier. The book cited, while self-published, was copyright by Lighthouse Ministries, which has been publishing tracts and booklets for the affirming Pentecostal community since the early 1980's. BroWCarey (talk) 22:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Trying to infer Pentecostalism by reading between the lines in a statement of faith is naked original research. You may or may not be correct, it doesn't matter. You need a source, not your own reasoning.
- Self-published sources are only usable under narrow circumstances, per WP:SPS. If you can demonstrate that Carey is a recognized authority whose views have been published by third parties with editorial oversight, I'm all ears. Failing that, he doesn't clear WP:V. And I sincerely hope that you don't plan to vigorously defend that "Hope Remains" website. You simply don't have any chance at all of showing it meets Misplaced Pages standards. Roccodrift (talk) 22:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)