| Revision as of 23:51, 15 January 2014 view sourceBaseball Bugs (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers126,966 edits arc← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 16 January 2014 view source Jc37 (talk | contribs)Administrators49,135 edits NoteNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <!-- New discussions below this line please! --> | <!-- New discussions below this line please! --> | ||
| == Apology == | |||
| *] | |||
| Per my discussion with ], it would seem that there may have been a confusion concerning the usage of the phrase "'''topic ban'''" by the proposer which was obviously meant to mean "'''page ban from all pages, talk pages, and subpages'''" of the reference desk. Wiki-shorthand-speak may be obvious to many regulars, but may not necessarily be obvious to everyone. (] specifically asked for clarification on this, but considering the interaction ban, you also should not have been expected to see that on his talk page.) | |||
| And so, you have my apology for blocking you for violating the page ban. | |||
| As someone else mentioned, going to the reference desk talk page after receiving a related ban was probably not a good idea, but in light of the apparent misunderstanding, I'll choose at this time to apologise and ] of your choice, rather than see it as an immediate "test" of the recently enacted ban. | |||
| I would unblock, but Nyttend has obviously done so already. - <b>]</b> 19:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 16 January 2014
"The Decline of Misplaced Pages" - new on Oct 22, 2013.
Unprotected talk page
User talk:Baseball Bugs/Archive018
Apology
Per my discussion with User:Nyttend, it would seem that there may have been a confusion concerning the usage of the phrase "topic ban" by the proposer which was obviously meant to mean "page ban from all pages, talk pages, and subpages" of the reference desk. Wiki-shorthand-speak may be obvious to many regulars, but may not necessarily be obvious to everyone. (User:The Rambling Man specifically asked for clarification on this, but considering the interaction ban, you also should not have been expected to see that on his talk page.)
And so, you have my apology for blocking you for violating the page ban.
As someone else mentioned, going to the reference desk talk page after receiving a related ban was probably not a good idea, but in light of the apparent misunderstanding, I'll choose at this time to apologise and WP:AGF of your choice, rather than see it as an immediate "test" of the recently enacted ban.
I would unblock, but Nyttend has obviously done so already. - jc37 19:40, 16 January 2014 (UTC)