Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:52, 24 January 2014

Doctor Strange

Please note that this film has NOT been announced by Marvel, and all information is still considered rumors. In addition, the Johnny Depp information traces back to Latino-Review, which is not a reliable source. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok no problem - TreCoolGuy (talk) 18 January 2014

Johnny Depp filmography

There was no reason to revert my edit removing studio as studios are not a necessary column to have in an actor filmography. Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, the only columns that are required are Year, Title, Role, and Notes. Adding a studio column will just clutter the table and add information that isn't about HIS filmography. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

• Other users have been on that page and kept it how I left it and had no problem about the edit Lady Lotus. -- TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014

Just because noone has objected to it doesn't mean it should stay. It clutters the table and has nothing to do with his films. The studio should be on the films article page not the actors. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

But there is enough room for the studios to be put in there Lady. TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014

Just because there is enough room for it STILL doesn't mean it belongs there. Again, look at WP:FILMOGRAPHY for reference. And you are now in violation of WP:3RR for continuing to revert the edit and not take it to the talk page like I told you to. WP:EDITWARRING can cause you to be blocked. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I can easily put a WP:EDITWARRING on you just because you have a problem with it doesn't mean everyone else does. So please for the last and final time Do not redirect my edits on Johnny Depp. Thanks -- TreCoolGuy talk 20 January 2014

And you need to understand that sometimes your edits are going to be reverted. You can't keep reverting them just because you don't agree with the editor doing it. I had a reasonable excuse and all your arguments were were just "nobody else has a problem with it" and nothing of note. I referenced MoS and you referenced your opinion, take it to the talk page instead. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

I was going to post this in a separate heading as a friendly knowledge update regarding the Iron Man trilogy page you are working on, but it will apply to this too. Tre, just because other stuff exists (ie "in film pages" or in this case, a studio column) doesn't mean that it is necessarily correct, or more should follow their example. So in this case, Lady Lotus is correct in saying there is no purpose for the studio column in a filmography table. Additionally, as I noted to you on TriiipleThreat's talk page, an Iron Man trilogy page is essentially the same page that is being discussed to merge back, and would not really serve a purpose itself, when the Marvel Cinematic Universe page and the individual pages are done so well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Guardians / Star-Lord

Here's the source: never mentioned as Star-Lord. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

You have been confirmed a sockmaster. Why haven't they blocked you?... TDFan2006 (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)