| Revision as of 00:11, 25 February 2014 editSnapSnap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers100,806 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:57, 27 February 2014 edit undoRenamed user 2423tgiuowf (talk | contribs)1,781 edits →ARTPOP Consensus: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ==FLC2== | ==FLC2== | ||
| Hi, sorry for bothering you, but could you please comment on ]? I'd really appreciate it. Thank you! <span style="text-shadow:#CCC 0.1em 0.3em 0.3em">]</span> ] 16:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC) | Hi, sorry for bothering you, but could you please comment on ]? I'd really appreciate it. Thank you! <span style="text-shadow:#CCC 0.1em 0.3em 0.3em">]</span> ] 16:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == ARTPOP Consensus == | |||
| {{Ping|SnapSnap}} There has been a long discussion on the ARTPOP talk page about what the critical reception section should state and I'm attempting to bring in outside opinions as the discussion has gotten stagnant. Just to make sure you understand the situation fully, here are the nine sources I've listed that explicitly state that the album received generally positive reviews: , , , , , , , , . I'm arguing for the page to state that Artpop received general positive reviews with a disclaimer afterwards that states that the reception has been more ambivalent than her past works. STATic has been engaged in this debate for months and has admitted twice that he dislikes Lady Gaga and even made fun of her and her fans, which obviously constitutes ]. Homeostasis has previously been blocked from editing due to his unprofessional behavior on Gaga pages and has recently admitted that he's been accused numerous times of bias against the artist in question. This has been a ridiculous process that had no business lasting as long as it did, but as you can see, the consensus is obviously generally positive, although the response was more ambivalent than her previous work. ] (]) 15:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:57, 27 February 2014
 Archives |
Wanderlust album cover
What was the reason you replaced my own upload of the cover of Wanderlust with your own? Whichever way you want to put it, it still comes down to the fact it's non-free media, and all you did was provide a more detailed template and file name. Your source for it is not any more legitimate; both merely sell the album and do not own it, nor the image. On the whole, I feel it was unnecessary, and my image will now inevitably face deletion (as it is not being used on any page) because it appears you wanted your own version there for no real reason I can see. Ss112 16:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
FL
Hello, could you please comment, give your opinion on Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/Natalia Kills discography/archive1? Thank you in advance! prism △ 18:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Blanking articles
Hi, you're probably right that those two song articles would fail an AfD, but all the same I'm not sure it's a good idea to just blank articles with no discussion and no note on the Talk page. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- In my view it's playing with semantics to say that blanking an article and redirecting it isn't blanking the article. I believe that removing an article from en.wp should be done by due process. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Kylie Minogue
the Cds ,here in the u.s has labeled Capitol.I just write what is written on the cds — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duraznoxxx (talk • contribs) 01:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- What's is the main label.the cds only labeled Capitol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duraznoxxx (talk • contribs) 01:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duraznoxxx (talk • contribs) 01:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Halcyon (album)
Having artwork for Halcyon Days is not vandalism. Some pages have artwork for a deluxe version of the album. It's the same as that. hadji87
Album covers
Why are you replacing JPG album covers with PNG versions anyway?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
FLC2
Hi, sorry for bothering you, but could you please comment on Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Natalia Kills/archive1? I'd really appreciate it. Thank you! Prism △ 16:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
ARTPOP Consensus
@SnapSnap: There has been a long discussion on the ARTPOP talk page about what the critical reception section should state and I'm attempting to bring in outside opinions as the discussion has gotten stagnant. Just to make sure you understand the situation fully, here are the nine sources I've listed that explicitly state that the album received generally positive reviews: DigitalSpy, Metacritic's weighted consensus of generally favorable, The Huffington Post, Entertainmentwise, YahooMusic, The Southern Digest, Pride Publishing Group, Off the Shelf, Street Insider. I'm arguing for the page to state that Artpop received general positive reviews with a disclaimer afterwards that states that the reception has been more ambivalent than her past works. STATic has been engaged in this debate for months and has admitted twice that he dislikes Lady Gaga and even made fun of her and her fans, which obviously constitutes WP:Bias. Homeostasis has previously been blocked from editing due to his unprofessional behavior on Gaga pages and has recently admitted that he's been accused numerous times of bias against the artist in question. This has been a ridiculous process that had no business lasting as long as it did, but as you can see, the consensus is obviously generally positive, although the response was more ambivalent than her previous work. Reece Leonard (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)