| Revision as of 01:38, 24 April 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,540 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:DoRD/Archive 7) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:46, 24 April 2014 edit undoAciddery (talk | contribs)16 edits →Socks with abusive account names: spi of yogeshNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| Can you look for a connection between the new accounts at ? (unrelated to the one IP edit in there, it just happened to be at the same time) ] (]) 23:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | Can you look for a connection between the new accounts at ? (unrelated to the one IP edit in there, it just happened to be at the same time) ] (]) 23:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Another CU has already taken care of everything. Thanks —] (]) 01:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | :Another CU has already taken care of everything. Thanks —] (]) 01:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::See ] and reply. I don't see any possibility that I will get the access to any of those 2 accounts anymore, because one was banned without any actual reason, you had a scan so you know it. And I don't remember password of other acc anymore. But main thing is, that i never abused any of these accounts, and I have tagged them. I don't know if I can create a page on ], but i think that the account can be unbanned, because you can see that it was not related to ]. ] (]) 01:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:46, 24 April 2014
 | Welcome to my talk page.
|
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Latest sock of Daffyduck1234
Hi. You CU-blocked Pomloverborn1999, a sock of Daffyduck1234. Now the editor User:GoldenCorral is editing the same suite of articles. Could you check to see if this is the same editor and block if appropriate? Thanks. BMK (talk) 14:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- That account and CocacolaRock (talk · contribs) are
Confirmed socks. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. —DoRD (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks for the quick action. BMK (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
It's probable that User:Hellomyfairkitty is the latest sock. Although there's only one article overlap (Theresa Caputo), the pattern is exactly the same. BMK (talk) 04:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- They and Dodomother5985 are the latest socks. Cheers —DoRD (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Topbill1818 might be another. BMK (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, plus three others. :\ —DoRD (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Topbill1818 might be another. BMK (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
GoluckyMon seems like it's another. BMK (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- BashMonster too. BMK (talk) 13:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes - those two plus MrEditorManToFrond are now blocked. —DoRD (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again, sorry to keep bugging you. BMK (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, at least they're easy to spot. There was another possible sock created a short time ago, but it hasn't edited yet, so please keep an eye on the usual targets. —DoRD (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Will do. BMK (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, at least they're easy to spot. There was another possible sock created a short time ago, but it hasn't edited yet, so please keep an eye on the usual targets. —DoRD (talk) 14:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks again, sorry to keep bugging you. BMK (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes - those two plus MrEditorManToFrond are now blocked. —DoRD (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Looks like Dodobird587 is another. BMK (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- That's the one. —DoRD (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Donemoney and ColleenCharokee looks like the newest ones. BMK (talk) 10:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- <sigh> Both blocked. —DoRD (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I assume there's no way to stop account creation by this person - they're not on a static IP or a small enough range that it could be blocked? BMK (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't think so, and these two accounts were on a different range. I'll see if anything can be done when the (inevitable) next accounts pop up. —DoRD (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I assume there's no way to stop account creation by this person - they're not on a static IP or a small enough range that it could be blocked? BMK (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
More socks of Mr Wiki Pro
He's back as User:Democrat supporter Mr Wiki Pro, and he's continuing to harass me. Are there any ways in which I can stop him from spamming my notifications bar? Can you please block him, and see if there's a way to keep him from coming back? Thanks. I greatly appreciate any help you can offer. LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Another admin has blocked the account. Unfortunately, the only advice I can offer is to ignore him. —DoRD (talk) 12:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. Well, hopefully this will end soon. LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:01, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Good day, sir. Here's another one.
He apologized to me, but I'm very unsure about whether or not he means it. Regardless, I believe that the continuation of creating sock accounts breaches WP:SOCK. By the way, Happy Easter! :) LightandDark2000 (talk) 11:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- I was telling the truth I am going to stop annoying you lightandDark.--Paper cup of beeer (talk) 11:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, only your actions will determine the truth of that. By the way, you should really stop harassing other users and give up sockpuppetry for good. It's not doing you any good at all. If you stop, at least there is a small chance that you can eventually return to Misplaced Pages as a good contributer. LightandDark2000 (talk) 11:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- No, I will not return as a good contributer. Socking is too adictive. --No more thank spam (talk) 11:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- sigh. As much as that disappoints me, your choice is your choice. LightandDark2000 (talk) 11:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- No, I will not return as a good contributer. Socking is too adictive. --No more thank spam (talk) 11:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Well, only your actions will determine the truth of that. By the way, you should really stop harassing other users and give up sockpuppetry for good. It's not doing you any good at all. If you stop, at least there is a small chance that you can eventually return to Misplaced Pages as a good contributer. LightandDark2000 (talk) 11:26, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Daft SPI
Sorry, I'm afraid I messed the page format. I was surprised to see two entries already there. Thanks for doing the fix. Jack | 15:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- No problem - I know that the format can be confusing. —DoRD (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
LeeParq and TwoEscarf
I noticed you blocked TwoEscarf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log); could you possibly take a look at LeeParq (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) who looks somewhat similar to me? --John (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- I did block that account, apparently. Can you give me a diff or two to show that LeeParq is related to them? Thanks —DoRD (talk) 02:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies...I was tired and didn't look at their contributions. After checking, I ended up blocking LeeParq and four more related accounts. —DoRD (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Looking at the histories of some of the articles edited by these accounts, I'm certain that there are more socks out there, but I'll have to dig deeper to figure out if there is a known master account. These are all the same, if anyone wants to research it before I get around to it:
- —DoRD (talk) 10:42, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nice work. Thank you. --John (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Poaching on your territory
I took the liberty of blocking this range, which you have previously blocked based on checkuser evidence. The anonymous IP vandalism from this range was sufficient cause (in my opinion) for an "ordinary" range block, but their track record plus my spider sense detecting correlation with a gaggle of recent VOAs led me to harden the block. Feel free to overrule me if I went too far. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- The block is just fine - the only edits from that range are by the same abusive vandal. Thanks —DoRD (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Goody. Talking about poaching, this character implicitly claims to come from the same farm. Such wasted energy. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed. I don't understand what motivates people like this, but I do what I can to slow them down. Thanks again. —DoRD (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Goody. Talking about poaching, this character implicitly claims to come from the same farm. Such wasted energy. Favonian (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Socks with abusive account names
Can you look for a connection between the new accounts at ? (unrelated to the one IP edit in there, it just happened to be at the same time) Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Another CU has already taken care of everything. Thanks —DoRD (talk) 01:29, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yogesh_Khandke#Comments_by_other_users and reply. I don't see any possibility that I will get the access to any of those 2 accounts anymore, because one was banned without any actual reason, you had a scan so you know it. And I don't remember password of other acc anymore. But main thing is, that i never abused any of these accounts, and I have tagged them. I don't know if I can create a page on User:RealRx, but i think that the account can be unbanned, because you can see that it was not related to User:Rafikhsk. Aciddery (talk) 01:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)