| Revision as of 21:54, 25 April 2014 editSjuttiosjuochfjorton (talk | contribs)152 edits →Your latest removal will be reverted on a daily basis (>24 hrs) until you have suggested a compromise or reworded my contribution. If you are interested we can also try a conflict dispute. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:DRN← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:56, 25 April 2014 edit undoSjuttiosjuochfjorton (talk | contribs)152 edits →Your latest removal will be reverted on a daily basis (>24 hrs) until you have suggested a compromise or reworded my contribution. If you are interested we can also try a conflict dispute. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:DRNNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| Hi, | Hi, | ||
| You are correct that Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be a "collection of indiscriminate facts". Neither is it supposed to be filled with opinionated quotes from personal blogs/websites, especially if the original statement is not entirely objective. Beatrice Lugger's complaint was exaggerated and RG members are very unlikely to obtain higher scores unless having an extensive publication record. Her statement should not have been quoted or it should have been contrasted. Misplaced Pages has to be objective and we have to scrutinize personal blogs/websites. The facts that I gave can be obtained through the original reference, but I will add a link to the website as well. Your removal will be reverted on a daily basis until you have suggested a compromise or engage in a meaningful discussion. | You are correct that Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be a "collection of indiscriminate facts". Neither is it supposed to be filled with opinionated quotes from personal blogs/websites, especially if the original statement is not entirely objective. Beatrice Lugger's complaint was exaggerated and RG members are very unlikely to obtain higher scores unless having an extensive publication record. Her statement should not have been quoted or it should have been contrasted. Misplaced Pages has to be objective and we have to scrutinize personal blogs/websites. The facts that I gave can be obtained through the original reference, but I will add a link to the website as well. Your removal will be reverted on a daily basis until you have suggested a compromise or engage in a more meaningful discussion. | ||
| Regards | Regards | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 25 April 2014
Welcome to my talk page. Please email me for anything that requires prompt attention.
Please click here to leave a message.
Nova Publishers
Hello,
I am reviewing information you post and delete on Nova site. And its quite confusing to me, especially when facts are deleted. I would like to know your reasoning behind it.
Thank you. Anna — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaCRittenberg (talk • contribs) 19:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate collection of facts. The text that got reverted is not encyclopedic in the opinion of several editors, not just myself. Please attend to the more urgent notices on your own page about conflict of interest and edit warring against consensus. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 19:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Request for comment
There is a discussion at Talk:List of United States congressional districts related to style of new district-level maps for the post-2013 United States congressional districts. Your input would be appreciated. Thank you. --7partparadigm 02:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Article the First
In your zeal to improve the article Article the First you removed the defaultsort and category from the article with this edit. Take care. --Bejnar (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. The final section of the paper consisted entirely of unencyclopedic material, so I cleared the section. It may be considered a bit of a bug in our software that tags of that kind (which are invisible when you read the page, but not when you dig into the wiki) are considered part of the final section. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 17:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angevins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Anjou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. The link was intended as written. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 12:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Your latest removal will be reverted on a daily basis (>24 hrs) until you have suggested a compromise or reworded my contribution. If you are interested we can also try a conflict dispute. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:DRN24_hrs)_until_you_have_s">
Hi,
You are correct that Misplaced Pages is not supposed to be a "collection of indiscriminate facts". Neither is it supposed to be filled with opinionated quotes from personal blogs/websites, especially if the original statement is not entirely objective. Beatrice Lugger's complaint was exaggerated and RG members are very unlikely to obtain higher scores unless having an extensive publication record. Her statement should not have been quoted or it should have been contrasted. Misplaced Pages has to be objective and we have to scrutinize personal blogs/websites. The facts that I gave can be obtained through the original reference, but I will add a link to the website as well. Your removal will be reverted on a daily basis until you have suggested a compromise or engage in a more meaningful discussion.
Regards Sjuttiosjuochfjorton