Misplaced Pages

User talk:ESkog: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:54, 1 July 2006 editAckoz (talk | contribs)799 edits IQ as a criterion← Previous edit Revision as of 07:56, 1 July 2006 edit undoAckoz (talk | contribs)799 edits IQ as a criterionNext edit →
Line 129: Line 129:
== IQ as a criterion == == IQ as a criterion ==


I use IQ (i.e. the value I estimated) as a criterion for assessing the user's ability to be an admin or his ability to produce a valid vote on RfA. It is a nonsense, but I find most of the oppose votes equally laughable. I have the same rights as the other editors, and saying that "he didn't pass my IQ test" is not the same as if I was saying "he is stupid". Pure logic, if I say a didn't pass my test because it's not bigger than 10, it doesn't mean that a is lower than 5. Got that? I am removing your inflammatory comment from my talk page. ] ] 07:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC) I use IQ (i.e. the value I estimated) as a criterion for assessing the user's ability to be an admin or his ability to produce a valid vote on RfA. It is a nonsense, but I find the criterions for most of the oppose votes equally laughable. And I didn't disrupt[REDACTED] to make a point, thus I didn't violate ]. I have the same rights as the other editors, and saying that "he didn't pass my IQ test" is not the same as if I was saying "he is stupid", thus this is no personal attack. Pure logic, if I say a didn't pass my test because it's not bigger than 10, it doesn't mean that a is lower than 5. Got that? I am removing your inflammatory comment from my talk page. ] ] 07:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:56, 1 July 2006

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.


Index of Talk Page archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017

VFD on PIHNN

ESkog, since some people spoke against my subpage, I created a VFD to see if the community at large wants to delete it. I have it so 10 net deletion votes (10 more deletion votes than keep votes) will convince me to agree to delete it (by adding the db-owner template of course.) Feel free to take a look, and vote on it if you'd like. You can tell other users to vote there too if you want. --Shultz IV 03:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Erroneous VandalProof warning

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hello Kitty on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Porqin 01:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

The aforementioned warning by me was incorrectly added, that being said:
This is rather intriguing, when the page was loaded, I rolled back and warned the user who vandalized Hello Kitty. It then showed up as vandalized again, so I rolled back and warned again. This time it warned my self, and corrected to the right version of Hello Kitty. I must have clicked the first time at the same moment you reverted, because I clearly viewed the vandalistic edit on my page, and attempted to fix it.


So, I don't know if I was in error here, the program was in error, or bad timing (luck). Thanks for the comment.

-- Porqin 01:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

6-16-06

I was not vandalizing the California gubernatorial elections, 2006 article. I was just deleting polls for Arnold v. Westley, as Westley has been knocked out in the primany, making the poll unnecesary. 68.4.58.77

BOT - Regarding your recent protection of Al Gore:

You recently protected this page but did not give a protection summary. If this is an actual (not deleted) article, talk, or project page, make sure that it is listed on WP:PP. Be sure to use protection summaries when you protect pages. VoABot will list such protected pages only if there is a summary (part of the deleted pages filter). Do not remove this notice until a day or so, otherwise it may get reposted. Thanks. VoABot 03:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

DVD+R/W's RfA

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which ended with the result of (74/0/0). If there is anything I can help with feel free to ask. Also, if there is anything I am doing wrong, please point that out as well. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Highest regards, DVD+ R/W 01:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your time

Dear ESkog,
Thank you very much for your contributions to my recent RfA. I am pleased to announce that it passed with a tally of 72/11/1, and I am now an administrator. Although you did not choose to support the request, I can assure you that I have taken your advice to heart and will be a better administrator for it. I'll be taking things slowly at first and getting used to the tools, but please let me know if there are any admin jobs I can do to help you, now or in the future. —Cuiviénen 02:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks!

File:FA-22 Raptor.jpg Thanks for voting!
Hello ESkog, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 22:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Lyrics

Thank you for your contributions in making this pretentious weblog, masquerading as an encyclopedia, even less useful than it currently is. Wahkeenah 23:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

  • What you're doing is leaving a bunch of useless song stub articles. I assume your next step will be to zap those, as they are liable to be reduced to a single sentence telling the reader what he already knows. Wahkeenah 23:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Talk page

I've seen worse. And with all the space you're freeing up by zapping lyrics, there should be plenty of extra room. Wahkeenah 23:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism

Vandalism is one thing but to mention something factual, such as Italy getting velvet glove treatment from the refs, that is factual and not vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.175.244.233 (talkcontribs) 17:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Linas

The true vandalism is what Linas does, not me. See discussion "The certainty principle" on his talk page. Now that he does not know what to answer to Rcq, he just ignores him. Lexitom 17:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Anon question

Whu did u put stuff back on my page? I stopped, so I don't nied it their. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.166.255.181 (talkcontribs) 05:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

I apolgised to him. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.166.255.181 (talkcontribs) 06:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

why do u guys take this place so sriously? Its just an website —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.166.255.181 (talkcontribs) 06:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Why are is u warning me. all i say was goodbye. explain why is warning their —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.166.255.181 (talkcontribs) 06:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

answer my questionm please

Thanks

Thanks for the speedy reply ESkog. Do you have any idea how I can fix this problem for good short of actually paying for a static IP Adress. It's just that after four times I'm quite sick of it and any solution or ideas would be great. If you have an answer just put it on my talk page. Once again, thanks for the speedy reply, it usually takes about an hour to get a response. --Tobes 07:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

You are mistaken

This is regarding your message to User:Telex. The fact is that there is a wanton vandal, known generally around WP as the "Rajput Troll," who is vandalising all my edits, apart from the Rajput page. There is an Arbcom decision against him. After that, he has begun infesting Misplaced Pages under a new sockpuppet every day, and a whole category-full of such sockpuppets have been banned so far. Telex is going out on a limb to help me in containig the vandalsim. Your rebuke to him is therefore seriously misplaced and will only serve to demoralize him. I hope you will retract the comment. Regards, ImpuMozhi 15:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your comment to 71.139.3.152

You wrongly commented that I had vandalized NeoChaosX's user page. You are mistaken. NeoChaosX has mounted a sustained campaign of vandalism against my contributions to Misplaced Pages, particularly to the California State University, San Jose State University, and California State Normal School pages. I believe he deleted the later.

Please advise me how I can go about securing the banning of user User:NeoChaosX, for wanton Misplaced Pages vandalism.

Thank You. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.139.3.152 (talkcontribs) 05:12, June 28, 2006 (UTC)

You haven't even edited any of those articles, how could he have vandalised your edits to them? Kevin_b_er 05:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Be bold compromise

For your most excellent compromise on Be bold, I hereby award you the Barnstar of Diligence --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC) (KC)

Hi ESkog, I was very impressed by your compromise on Be bold. It looks like it deflected the wheel war, and hopefully it will put an end to the arguments, but I just wanted to give you a barnstar in thanks and recognition of your compromise. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

spam?

cmon i edited this article about 4 months ago and it wasnt called spam, but now you call spam the same thing i did before? Cmon.  : ( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kanacr (talkcontribs) 15:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

UP revertreverts

Thanks! Talk about pay back in kind! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 21:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks again!

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 21:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Award for vandal-magnet user page

EvocativeIntrigue hereby offers you the award for having an incredibly magnetic userpage for vandals! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 21:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

IQ as a criterion

I use IQ (i.e. the value I estimated) as a criterion for assessing the user's ability to be an admin or his ability to produce a valid vote on RfA. It is a nonsense, but I find the criterions for most of the oppose votes equally laughable. And I didn't disrupt[REDACTED] to make a point, thus I didn't violate WP:POINT. I have the same rights as the other editors, and saying that "he didn't pass my IQ test" is not the same as if I was saying "he is stupid", thus this is no personal attack. Pure logic, if I say a didn't pass my test because it's not bigger than 10, it doesn't mean that a is lower than 5. Got that? I am removing your inflammatory comment from my talk page. ackoz 07:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

User talk:ESkog: Difference between revisions Add topic