Misplaced Pages

User talk:DarkFalls: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:20, 3 July 2014 editLivelikemusic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers55,637 edits Add.← Previous edit Revision as of 17:26, 3 July 2014 edit undoCebr1979 (talk | contribs)10,843 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 135: Line 135:
::But that's the thing; a lot of the pages they do edit on are pages I also edit on, since they're soap-related. And I'm afraid to express or approach something with said-user, for fear of past situations happening, because it was an ugly situation that I don't feel like repeating. And I don't like feeling that way. ''']''' ] 01:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC) ::But that's the thing; a lot of the pages they do edit on are pages I also edit on, since they're soap-related. And I'm afraid to express or approach something with said-user, for fear of past situations happening, because it was an ugly situation that I don't feel like repeating. And I don't like feeling that way. ''']''' ] 01:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
:::{{ping|DarkFalls}} Once again, being accused of ] and down below, tattle-taling. simply by following pages on my Watchlist. Will you now allow for an interaction ban, or something? Please? It is getting out of hand at this point! All I am doing is following the formats of {{TI|Infobox soap character}}, and I'm accusing of reverting their edits and Wikihounding them. It's making me want to quit Misplaced Pages because of how much I am hated by this one person. Another person does the same of me, and they receive nothing like the messages I am receiving. At this point, it's feeling constantly abusive, and I am over it. It is not fair in the slightest, I have been keeping my distance. The mere fact I have pages on my Watchlist makes me a Wikihounder now? That is pure accusation, and I'm over feeling bullied by said-user. ''']''' ] 17:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC) :::{{ping|DarkFalls}} Once again, being accused of ] and down below, tattle-taling. simply by following pages on my Watchlist. Will you now allow for an interaction ban, or something? Please? It is getting out of hand at this point! All I am doing is following the formats of {{TI|Infobox soap character}}, and I'm accusing of reverting their edits and Wikihounding them. It's making me want to quit Misplaced Pages because of how much I am hated by this one person. Another person does the same of me, and they receive nothing like the messages I am receiving. At this point, it's feeling constantly abusive, and I am over it. It is not fair in the slightest, I have been keeping my distance. The mere fact I have pages on my Watchlist makes me a Wikihounder now? That is pure accusation, and I'm over feeling bullied by said-user. ''']''' ] 17:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
It's always bullying when it's someone else, isn't it? You were told to stop following my edits and, if you really felt strongly, then to take it to the talk page. You ignored both and continued on with your usual ways of just reverting. That's not an accusation, livelikemusic, that's a fact! You were told to stop something and you didn't. That's all I'm going to say. I won't be returning to this conversation.] (]) 17:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

I went to your contributions to see if you had responded to my suggestion about Amber Moore's infobox and saw this. You can talk to me about anything! In fact, that would be preferred (and I've told you that before)! It's the reverts with no explanations that are upsetting because then I'm confused and don't know why you reverted my edits. Even when I ask you about something (as I recently did on your talk page about Paige Larson), you just delete my question without answering creating more confusion! When I inquired about the soap opera infobox template you quoted, you ignored that too (I had to find out from someone else today). With you, Livelikemusic, it's always revert and ignore. Revert and ignore. Then, I find these tattle-tale posts saying you're scared of me but, I've tried having discussions with you (dating back to our very first encounter) and get ignored. Then, my edits get reverted again. When you do finally respond to me, I get these "policies" quoted and when I ask about them, you go back to ignoring! You do know more about editing than me, yes, but would it kill you to explain a revert or answer a question once in awhile? Confusion leads to frustration and frustration leads to anger. Arre 9 reverted something today and showed me where it said he was right and I dropped it and corrected my edit immediately. We never fought. It was completely civil the whole time.] (]) 02:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC) I went to your contributions to see if you had responded to my suggestion about Amber Moore's infobox and saw this. You can talk to me about anything! In fact, that would be preferred (and I've told you that before)! It's the reverts with no explanations that are upsetting because then I'm confused and don't know why you reverted my edits. Even when I ask you about something (as I recently did on your talk page about Paige Larson), you just delete my question without answering creating more confusion! When I inquired about the soap opera infobox template you quoted, you ignored that too (I had to find out from someone else today). With you, Livelikemusic, it's always revert and ignore. Revert and ignore. Then, I find these tattle-tale posts saying you're scared of me but, I've tried having discussions with you (dating back to our very first encounter) and get ignored. Then, my edits get reverted again. When you do finally respond to me, I get these "policies" quoted and when I ask about them, you go back to ignoring! You do know more about editing than me, yes, but would it kill you to explain a revert or answer a question once in awhile? Confusion leads to frustration and frustration leads to anger. Arre 9 reverted something today and showed me where it said he was right and I dropped it and corrected my edit immediately. We never fought. It was completely civil the whole time.] (]) 02:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


Revision as of 17:26, 3 July 2014

DarkFalls

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— To Do —— DYK

Wikimedia Commons —— Meta-Wiki —— Misplaced Pages —— Wikisource —— Wikiquote —— Wiktionary


 DarkFalls' Talk Page

Welcome to DarkFalls' talk page. Please keep civil and sign your comments.

Archives
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010-2011
2012-2013
2013-2014

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

Hi

Hi. Can you delete these racistic comments? I've been warned and I don't want to start an "edit war." thanks. Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

*stabs*

:) Daniel (talk) 10:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

:) I am pleasantly surprised to see that the hole had not consumed you. —Dark 11:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Haha harsh! Daniel (talk) 11:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

ANI re livelikemusic and Cebr1979 Comment

Hello, it appears livelikemusic and Cebr1979 have made up after your responses to them. I am not an admin so I don't think I can 'close' the discussion. Badanagram (attempt) 19:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

If you feel that the discussion needs a "close", then feel free to add the template (I am not aware of any policy against non-admin closure assuming it's clear-cut). Personally I would rather have it archive naturally unless it is a contentious issue, there seems to be little harm in leaving it open for further opinion, so to speak. I find it unnecessary to add {{resolved}} to every thread. —Dark 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
May you be directed to this for further informative use. livelikemusic 23:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
They felt it appropriate to open another ANI report. livelikemusic 03:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Confused

I'm confused by the message you left on my talk page and at ANI... Why was socking brought up? I only have one account.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

—Dark 22:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

So clearly livelikemusic has two (or more) of them or you wouldn't have brought it up. Lovely.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

It is a precautionary warning. You are continuing your assumptions of bad faith and it is extremely disappointing. —Dark 22:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. It just seemed like you were onto something there and it I really want to stress that I only have one account. Anywho, it looks like the conversation is closed so I thank you for your time.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

User talk:Ana Xsosta

While I don't see any problem in removing templates from the above talk page per se, you did remove some written material as well (in the section started by LM2000, below the first and only template). --VeryCrocker (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. —Dark 18:12, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

abusive edit summary

the edit summary of this page is full of abuse.. clear them all https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Durga_Vahini&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.0.242 (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Done. —Dark 19:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

this edit summary also contain abuse.. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&action=history (third one from top)

>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&oldid=612187872

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.0.242 (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

more edit summary with more abuses

this edit summary also contains abuse http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Bindu_Madhav_Pathak&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.0.242 (talk) 19:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Deor

Hi Dark. I think you tried to support, but the ":" you entered means it won't show up in the total. Thanks for participating. - Dank (push to talk) 14:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

No I was awaiting the answer given in question 8. Unfortunately I didn't think the answer was up to par. —Dark 20:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Assumptions being made AGAIN

Once again, assumptions are being made again against me. Is there any way you could make this just stop? I haven't been on Misplaced Pages is days, and I'm still being accused of things and meaning things that I'm not. livelikemusic 16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Potential violation again , assuming and stating things that I never have stated, and talking about users themselves and not their edits. Not trying to stir up trouble, just feel like potential biting may be going on, and that a potential interaction ban may need to take place at this point to see how that works out. I'm just over feeling like I'm doing all wrong; I feel like while I could be overreacting in this situation, that's why I'm coming to you, hoping for potential guidance (and support) in this, as we're bound to run into the same circles of editing, due to the interest of soap operas, but I've made my attempts to steer-clear from any potential incivility, however, I don't feel the same is being returned. livelikemusic 00:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

In my opinion, just don't interact with him and don't follow his edits etc. The link you provided does seem to be an improvement from past behaviour. If you strongly disagree with one of his edits, feel free to express what's wrong on the talk page, but in general if you don't feel strongly about it, ignoring him is probably a good idea. I don't see a need for a formal interaction ban. —Dark 01:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
But that's the thing; a lot of the pages they do edit on are pages I also edit on, since they're soap-related. And I'm afraid to express or approach something with said-user, for fear of past situations happening, because it was an ugly situation that I don't feel like repeating. And I don't like feeling that way. livelikemusic 01:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
@DarkFalls: Once again, being accused of Wikihounding and down below, tattle-taling. simply by following pages on my Watchlist. Will you now allow for an interaction ban, or something? Please? It is getting out of hand at this point! All I am doing is following the formats of {{Infobox soap character}}, and I'm accusing of reverting their edits and Wikihounding them. It's making me want to quit Misplaced Pages because of how much I am hated by this one person. Another person does the same of me, and they receive nothing like the messages I am receiving. At this point, it's feeling constantly abusive, and I am over it. It is not fair in the slightest, I have been keeping my distance. The mere fact I have pages on my Watchlist makes me a Wikihounder now? That is pure accusation, and I'm over feeling bullied by said-user. livelikemusic 17:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

It's always bullying when it's someone else, isn't it? You were told to stop following my edits and, if you really felt strongly, then to take it to the talk page. You ignored both and continued on with your usual ways of just reverting. That's not an accusation, livelikemusic, that's a fact! You were told to stop something and you didn't. That's all I'm going to say. I won't be returning to this conversation.Cebr1979 (talk) 17:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC) I went to your contributions to see if you had responded to my suggestion about Amber Moore's infobox and saw this. You can talk to me about anything! In fact, that would be preferred (and I've told you that before)! It's the reverts with no explanations that are upsetting because then I'm confused and don't know why you reverted my edits. Even when I ask you about something (as I recently did on your talk page about Paige Larson), you just delete my question without answering creating more confusion! When I inquired about the soap opera infobox template you quoted, you ignored that too (I had to find out from someone else today). With you, Livelikemusic, it's always revert and ignore. Revert and ignore. Then, I find these tattle-tale posts saying you're scared of me but, I've tried having discussions with you (dating back to our very first encounter) and get ignored. Then, my edits get reverted again. When you do finally respond to me, I get these "policies" quoted and when I ask about them, you go back to ignoring! You do know more about editing than me, yes, but would it kill you to explain a revert or answer a question once in awhile? Confusion leads to frustration and frustration leads to anger. Arre 9 reverted something today and showed me where it said he was right and I dropped it and corrected my edit immediately. We never fought. It was completely civil the whole time.Cebr1979 (talk) 02:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

User:DarkFalls/Leonardo Rocco

You userfied this without the attribution history. This is not permitted - I have therefore deleted the content. You are of course welcome to restore it properly by moving the history into your user area. Thanks. Spartaz 16:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Apologies, meant to delete straight afterwards but forgot. —Dark 17:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

User talk:DarkFalls: Difference between revisions Add topic