Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:21, 18 July 2014

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Harmony944, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:02, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Open Season 3 edit

Your edit claiming to revert vandalism on Open Season 3 was in error - in actuality, you restored the vandalized version of the page, adding false sequel information, incorrect cast listings, and links to deleted pages. Please do not make such edits again without either discussing it on the talk page first, or giving valid references for your changes. MikeWazowski (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

really? What about Matt Munn being Boog and the other guy being Elliott? I'm pretty sure Joel McHale and Mike Epps reprised their respective roles as Elliott and Boog--Harmony944 (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

They did for the second film, not the third. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Open Season 3 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. - Happysailor 19:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Look at the page for Mike Epps before you start calling me the vandal--Harmony944 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

You can't use another Misplaced Pages page as a source - the revised listing is the correct one, and I've removed all the Open Season 3 & 4 references from the Mike Epps page as well. All of these fabrications over the Open Season articles can be traced to one editor with a history of adding false content. Please do not revert to his incorrect versions again. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

So staff of this very website can't be trusted, wow, so sad. I have to be honest, I thought you were the user that the fabrications were from. Looking back through the revision history, that's what it looked like to me. I'm sorry--Harmony944 (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

No, what happens is I caught this editor making an edit on an unrelated article, looked into it, and which led me to discover a long-term pattern of either falsehoods that no one caught as they developed gradually, or just outright hoaxes. Had you bothered to ask beforehand, this would have been explained to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Stewie Griffin. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article The '90s Are All That, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Digifan23 (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: The 90s Are All That

First off: I can't police that page all the time... I too found the claim that this was going to be a permanent block quite dubious. If it had been one person editing the page with that I would have immediately removed it, but I looked through the history and several people had put that information in there without anyone else trying to remove it by the time I found it. That's why I tagged it instead of removing it myself, expecting that if it was an elaborate hoax as I expected it to be someone with more direct knowledge than I would immediately remove it. As for whether or not it coincided with the Olympics, it did, and these special blocks usually coincide with events, but whether or not it was an intentional coincidence, well, I may have stepped a bit too far into WP:OR. I understand your frustration but please don't take it all out on me! J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 17:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Except there was no direct reference to the Olympics whether it was the Nickandmore tweets, article, or block Facebook post. It's not permanent, obviously, and saying it's Olympic based is speculation. It's as simple as that--Harmony944 (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, it appears the same types are at it again... they're citing the source as the 90sAAT Facebook page, which only mentions this past weekend anyway. I've removed it again and put a comment in warning (and on the talk page) them not to do it again or I would request protection, but you might want to keep an eye on it just in case. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 00:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully that'll stave off something. Also, keep in mind that they for some reason made a separate table for it, and while citing the facebook page, they never cited a specific post. The fact that I had previously added about Power Rangers considerations explicitly made on a post made by the block on its Facebook page, going as far as to cite the specific post, would (by precedent) make their justifying, general citation even more unacceptable.--Harmony944 (talk) 00:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2014

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Stop modifying my list of pages to be moved. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I edited the list based on the discussion made. Don't move pages if you can't find legitimate reason to do so--Harmony944 (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You don't seem to get it. You are not allowed at all to edit anyone else's comments without their express consent regardless of your own determination of the debate. This is the second time you highly refactored my requested move, and the first time resulted in the discussion being removed from the listing. Do not do it again, or I will seek punitive measures.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I didn't edit your comments. I edited the list based on the discussion at hand. You removed my comments you fucking hypocrite--Harmony944 (talk) 16:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You're not allowed to edit the list because I was the one who posted it. And I only removed your comments because you put them in at the same time as your mass removal of the list. I immediately restored them with my next edit so stop making yourself out to be the victim here.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

What's with the venom? You're the one making yourself out to be the victim here--Harmony944 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm not the person who's twisted someone else's words and claimed hypocrisy when none exists.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

When did I twist your words? The usage of "crazed"? I used WE, not I. You said the fandom was crazed. I am part of the fandom. Thus I used WE. Stop your bullshit already--Harmony944 (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I didn't say the fandom was crazed. I said that they had a "crazed definition" of something. Stop taking it as a slight.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 16:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Stop using the <big> tags. It's rude.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce, you may be blocked from editing. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

What I deleted is not a comment, it's a section break. Who are you to make these threats?--Harmony944 (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You did more than remove the section break in this edit. And this not a threat. It is a standard warning template.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

All I did was remove the section break and merge your comments, removing the redundant signature. Your warning is completely uncalled for--Harmony944 (talk) 18:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The commments should not have been merged because they were about two separate things. The section break is for ease of editing because we've wasted five days making circular arguments. Stop modifying my comments or edits to the talk page entirely. And stop using the <big> tag.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Power Rangers Megaforce. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)