Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:57, 8 August 2014

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Malik Shabazz}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Are you here because I deleted your article? Please read this before you leave me a message.

This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days

CRT on the Supreme Court

Hi Malik, Your improvements to the critical race theory page caught my attention. To my interest, my research has turned up that Sonia Sotomayor was strongly influenced by CRT some years ago and is the only one on the Supreme Court with this in her history. During the last week, I have been adding material from 3 new books on the Roberts court to her page and am almost done. Because of her unique background, I thought to ask you if the article is anywhere close to an upgrade by peer evaluation. She would be the first woman on the Supreme Court to reach the highest level of peer evaluation at Misplaced Pages. Possibly you could give the article a once over when/if time allows to let me know if this unique judge deserves this attention. I ask this only if this field is of interest to you and if time allows. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 00:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lawrence. I'll try to take a look at Sonia Sotomayor in the next week or so, but my schedule is tight and I may not be able. You might want to request a review at WP:Peer review. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. LawrencePrincipe (talk) 12:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Marcel Hillaire

Hi Malik Shabazz,

Why did you delete the page on Marcel Hillaire? He was a notable TV character actor in the B&W days, who appeared in such shows as LOST IN SPACE, THE TWILIGHT ZONE, GET SMART, MAN FROM UNCLE, and in Woody Allen's TAKE THE MONEY AND RUN. Goblinshark17 (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Goblinshark. The first article about Hillaire was a copyright violation, and the editor who started it blanked the page. See WP:G7. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 04:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I have re-created the article, using my own words and referencing his IMDB bio. Hope that's ok! Goblinshark17 (talk) 04:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Meetpavan

https://en.wikipedia.org/%CE%9CTorrent

I am wondering how it got edited from my account... I did not add any link or edit this page in any way... dont know how it got edited from my account... Let me know if u need any clarification... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetpavan (talk • contribs) 12:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't appear to have been edited from your account. Maybe an anonymous editor using your IP address edited it. Whatever the case, don't worry about it. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 21:55, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Any input would be appreciated

You were mentioned, also. Here: . Faustian (talk) 23:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. Would you mind adding some input here, also? It looks like someone not as familiar with this longstanding situation is trying to sanction me and COD T equally, which seems very wrong: .Faustian (talk) 03:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Mohammed Dajani Daoudi

On 4 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mohammed Dajani Daoudi, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mohammed Dajani Daoudi led the first group of students from Palestine to visit the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in Poland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mohammed Dajani Daoudi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

deletion of evidence of antisemitism

i received a message that original research to imply conclusions was not allowed, but what was deleted was instances of antisemitism occuring. Since I fail to see why a sign saying "No Jews allowed, but dogs are" being called antisemitic is drawing a conclusion from an article, I would like a non-biased editor to review this and fix the article and restore that example, thanks. A modern day no jews allowed sign absolutely belongs in the modern antisemitism page, there is no reasonable argument against that- it's modern and it's antisemitic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.143.113 (talk) 04:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Also, to have an article on bigotry but refuse to allow examples of such acts is fairly ridiculous. Misplaced Pages articles on bias etc are typically well-supported with actual examples of such occurences. It weakens the argument of the page when there are no cited events to demonstrate what is being talked about. I feel you are intentionally attempting to undermine the article via refusing to allow a page on antisemitism to list actual instances of antisemitism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.143.113 (talk) 05:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

The sources you cited simply summarize other sources and contain no original reporting. Far better to link to the original sources. One of the sources is clearly an opinion piece rather than a news source. A single sign in a shop window in Belgium and word of mouth reports of insults shouted at one Boston demonstration do not rise to the level of convincing evidence of a trend, in my view, though abhorrent as individual incidents. Your summary is not supported by the sources. Typographical errors, such as "Caucasian" and "tenet", while minor in comparison to the more substantive points, detract from the persuasiveness of your argument. Cullen Let's discuss it 05:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

You cite those reports as examples of "new antisemitism", but the sources didn't mention "new antisemitism". That makes your inclusion of them as examples original research, specifically synthesis, which is not permitted on Misplaced Pages. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 20:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

If it's any consolation...

Both the editor who started the RfC and another who supported it have been blocked as socks of an editor who's had a deep-seeded issue with me, thus confirming the suspicions I've had all along. Dan56 (talk) 06:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

You were right, and I assumed too much good faith. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 20:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	This is a gift of my appreciation! Lycahmae (talk) 13:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Help me to improve and restore the article Mulyashop

Hi, I have created a article Mulyashop about a new e-commerce company in India, yesterday. And its got deleted with reason A7. I have only put the factual data. Guide me how can i improve the notability or tell me about the mistakes I have made.

Binunice (talk) 14:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)