| Revision as of 05:04, 25 October 2014 editJoshua Jonathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers107,547 edits →Admin involvement request: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:01, 25 October 2014 edit undoAbecedare (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,231 edits →Clarification: noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| Hello, please clarify this. Is it disallowed to mention verbatim what both OED and EB mention within ] as in . Thanks. --] (]) 04:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra | Hello, please clarify this. Is it disallowed to mention verbatim what both OED and EB mention within ] as in . Thanks. --] (]) 04:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra | ||
| :I think it's nonsense, and I'm looking forward to the policy which says so. ] -] 05:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | :I think it's nonsense, and I'm looking forward to the policy which says so. ] -] 05:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Joshua, Looking at , I know that it ''apppears'' that additional citations to EB and OED are being added. But that is '''not''' the case: what is happening is that existing citations to those same refeernces (using the {{t1|sfn}} tag used throughout the article) are being ''duplicated'' (using the inconsistent and incomplete {{t1|cite}} template). Placinng this on your page, because the discussion on ] is such a lengthy mess, and because the misunderstanding seems to be raising tempers between you and I, which is unwarranted (and, personally disheartening to me) given our long history of cooperative editing. Cheers. ] (]) 06:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:01, 25 October 2014
Archive 2012
Archive 2013
Archive 2014
Please see my latest edit to Buddhism
Likely to be controversial.VictoriaGrayson 03:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Removed within half an hour... I've re-inserted your line, at another place in the lead. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Admin involvement request
Please see the Talk:India page. Since you are the last person to make a change there, am writing to you. Are you an admin? I request involvement of other wiki editors and admin to resolve points mentioned here. Can you help please? How do I go about it? Does this require going to dispute resolution? Please guide.--Mayasutra (talk) 00:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra
- I've answered at the talkpage. Keep calm, don't forget to breathe ;) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Clarification
Hello, please clarify this. Is it disallowed to mention verbatim what both OED and EB mention within ref tags as in this. Thanks. --Mayasutra (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Mayasutra
- I think it's nonsense, and I'm looking forward to the policy which says so. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Joshua, Looking at this diff, I know that it apppears that additional citations to EB and OED are being added. But that is not the case: what is happening is that existing citations to those same refeernces (using the {{sfn}} tag used throughout the article) are being duplicated (using the inconsistent and incomplete {{cite}} template). Placinng this on your page, because the discussion on Talk:India is such a lengthy mess, and because the misunderstanding seems to be raising tempers between you and I, which is unwarranted (and, personally disheartening to me) given our long history of cooperative editing. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)