| Revision as of 20:56, 27 November 2014 editLocksmith1865 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,646 edits →Talkback: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:27, 28 November 2014 edit undoLocksmith1865 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,646 edits →Edit Warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::Also, much of the editing on Misplaced Pages is done through ]. If you'd like particular changes, state them and garner support for them. When consensus on the talk page is achieved, then the edits can go into the article. Thanks. – ] (]) 20:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | ::Also, much of the editing on Misplaced Pages is done through ]. If you'd like particular changes, state them and garner support for them. When consensus on the talk page is achieved, then the edits can go into the article. Thanks. – ] (]) 20:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::I also never said there shouldn't be a criticism section but your version is just ridiculous and the discussion that was on there was just me raising my issues responding to all your questions and you ignoring my responses. Thats not real discussion. - ] <span style="font-size:85%">(])</span> 20:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | :::I also never said there shouldn't be a criticism section but your version is just ridiculous and the discussion that was on there was just me raising my issues responding to all your questions and you ignoring my responses. Thats not real discussion. - ] <span style="font-size:85%">(])</span> 20:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit Warring == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] <span style="font-size:85%">(])</span> 07:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:27, 28 November 2014
Talkback
Message added 20:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I am again inviting you to discuss your edits. SantiLak (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
You will see a discussion on this section. Maybe you don't like it, but it's there. A lot of articles have sections titled criticisms of public entities. The world won't end if the State Bar has one, and who know, perhaps it will get more developed and refined, as is usually the case. 2.177.207.221 (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- There was a discussion that you did not continue, you just abandoned it and then came back over a month later and started it over again. - SantiLak (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Also, much of the editing on Misplaced Pages is done through WP:CONSENSUS. If you'd like particular changes, state them and garner support for them. When consensus on the talk page is achieved, then the edits can go into the article. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- I also never said there shouldn't be a criticism section but your version is just ridiculous and the discussion that was on there was just me raising my issues responding to all your questions and you ignoring my responses. Thats not real discussion. - SantiLak (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Also, much of the editing on Misplaced Pages is done through WP:CONSENSUS. If you'd like particular changes, state them and garner support for them. When consensus on the talk page is achieved, then the edits can go into the article. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Edit Warring
Your recent editing history at State Bar of California shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - SantiLak (talk) 07:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC)