| Revision as of 01:07, 13 July 2006 editPilotguy (talk | contribs)21,089 edits Sigh.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:34, 13 July 2006 edit undoMajorly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,677 edits →Annoying thing: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
| ::Ugh, AOL is so irritating, I mean, why change the IP with EVERY page visit? I like the my my ISP handles dynamic IPs, your IP only changes if you are disconnected for more than a couple of days (which very rarely happens), so my IP is effectively static. Love it. {{unsigned|Lorian}} | ::Ugh, AOL is so irritating, I mean, why change the IP with EVERY page visit? I like the my my ISP handles dynamic IPs, your IP only changes if you are disconnected for more than a couple of days (which very rarely happens), so my IP is effectively static. Love it. {{unsigned|Lorian}} | ||
| :::Yeah - every ISP apart from AOL work like that ;) -- ]]<sup>]</sup> 15:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | :::Yeah - every ISP apart from AOL work like that ;) -- ]]<sup>]</sup> 15:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I'm surprised, I thought you were an administrator! If there is another request for you to become one, you'll get my support. --] ] 18:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for July 10th== | ==''Signpost'' updated for July 10th== | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 13 July 2006
I am: on a WikiBreakArchives: June 2005-May 2006|May 2006-July 2006
Please note that I will reply to any messages here, and not your talk page, in the interest of not splitting up threads.
Audition Music for BB7
Can you please explain to me why you removed the audition music for each of the housemates? Triangle e 14:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Because it's not notible information. -- 9cds 14:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's both non-notable, and uninteresting... --LorianC 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Whether something is "interesting" or not is an objective statement. I, personally, find this information interesting. Otherwise, I would not have added it. Triangle e 21:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Um, do you mind taking your fights off my talk page? -- 9cds 21:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is not a fight and you calling it as such makes it no more a fight. I am merely pointing out the objective nature of what makes an article "interesting". Triangle e 21:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Um, do you mind taking your fights off my talk page? -- 9cds 21:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Whether something is "interesting" or not is an objective statement. I, personally, find this information interesting. Otherwise, I would not have added it. Triangle e 21:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's both non-notable, and uninteresting... --LorianC 15:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
pfft
Just a pointer that I didn't start an edit war. --JD 16:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
BB7 Nominations Border
Although it was decided that a border might make it clearer as you pointed out on the talk page, Trampikey removed it because "i don't like it and its not needed!", which i agree with. However, you didn't revert his edit, only mine. Please stop being spiteful and readding it when I delete it for the same reason as Trampikey. It does look ridiculous and is rather pointless. All one needs to do is to go to the bottom of the table and glance across to see who's up for relocation to the new house or go and see the housemate box on the BB7 page.
Sorry for rambling on. Basically my point is that in my opinion, the border is not needed, looks stupid and Trampikey agrees with me. Also, that you didn't revert Trampikey's edit, only mine. Because it's me?? And finally, you put me up for the 3RR, when you're just as bad... Thanx :) Ellisjm 17:54 UTC 28 June 06
- I warned you against 3RR because you're reverting it constantly. If you dislike it, then please take it to the talk page, rather than taking it to an edit war. -- 9cds 17:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why didn't you take it to the talk page? It started off without a border, so you were the one that made the change. Ellism 18:01 UTC 28 June 06
- It's already on the talk page. -- 9cds 18:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ok. Discussion is a Good Thing :) Mind you, I don't feel like blocking more people for 3RR tonight though, so please refrain from reverting. If there's a consensus, there are other people to make those edits as well. --JoanneB 21:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, to add some spice to this, it was originally my idea to do this boldification (:-)) to make the page clearer. There's a discussion going on right now on the Talk page which seems to be swinging (slightly) towards the idea of making the nominations clearer (e.g. by boldifying the cell!). Please don't go on at cds about it too much, it's all my fault after all, she was just being sympathetic to my ideas! Budgiekiller 21:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's already on the talk page. -- 9cds 18:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why didn't you take it to the talk page? It started off without a border, so you were the one that made the change. Ellism 18:01 UTC 28 June 06
Hurrah!
Hey, just a quick note to you to say that (despite you going off on one once!) I'm really glad you're persevering and doing a good job around here! Let me know if there's anything I can help with (now and in the future). Budgiekiller 21:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, only just swa this. Thanks for your comments :) -- 9cds 19:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Not a problem, you're a proper busy bee! Budgiekiller 20:03, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Help please?
I would like this to be my signature: Trampikey
(Code: ''']<font color="green">]</font>]''' <sup>(])</sup><sup>(])</sup>)
But when I copy and paste that into "Signature" on my preferences, it doesn't work... can you help? Trampikey 23:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Do you have 'raw signature' selected? -- 9cds 23:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC) (As an added note, I'm not sure how well people will take to an RfA link in a signature)
- OK, I've removed the RfA... and I don't have the raw signature selected... Trampikey 00:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Try selecting it :) -- 9cds 00:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks... testing... Trampikey 01:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Seems to have worked :) Glad to be of assistance! -- 9cds 01:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi, thanks for all your questions on my RfA! I'm enjoying answering them! Trampikey 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
This one's for you,
It's a tough job, but somebody's gotta do it. Hang in there. --Pilot|guy 02:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
RFA thanks
Listing RFCs
Please remember when you list an RFC to add the date and time by writing ~~~~~ at the end. I have done so for the RFC you already listed. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, thanks for letting me know, and fixing it. -- 9cds 11:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 3rd.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 26 | 3 July 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Barnstar
Hey cds, thank you very much for the barnstar!! I hope the bot continues to function correctly for the duration of the election so there aren't any embarrassing muck-ups :) Cheers, and thanks again, Tangotango 15:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Hi. I have long been a member of WP:ESP. The thing is that I changed my username from User:Anirudhsbh / Andy123 to User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington / Nearly Headless Nick. So please put back my votes. Thanks and regards, --Nearly Headless Nick 09:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I can't - only users on the memberlist linked to can vote. May I suggest you log into your other account to vote? -- 9cds 09:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Copy Vio's
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#Following_Group_of_Images Ste4k
- Thanks for letting me know about these :) -- 9cds 17:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I listed them correctly; i.e. on the correct page. I don't dare put a copyvio on the BB page. I'm not really sure who to inform about this, so relying on your experience. The list is there, anyhow, so it should be easy to copy to the correct place. Ste4k 02:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think I found the right instructions. I followed those but am still not sure if I listed them correctly. Ste4k 03:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to put a notice on the page - I think what you've done is right (though, I'm not extremely experienced with images) - You've at least given clear reasons for deletion, which is the most important thing! -- 9cds 03:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Cello's sig
Sure, it just made me suspicious that it was a fake vote, so I just added it back in so other users checking the results wouldn't have the same problem. Titoxd 17:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. Nope, it's not fake. Sorry for inconvenience there :) -- 9cds 17:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Annoying thing
Don't you find it annoying when some unknown person keeps adding things which are not wanted? Btw are you an administrator? Alex9891 15:17, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah - it's annoying that they don't get the hint. Unfortunatly, the user was on AOL so a block wouldn't do much good. Thanks for your help in removing the spam. I'm not an administrator, no, which is also annoying ;) -- 9cds 15:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ugh, AOL is so irritating, I mean, why change the IP with EVERY page visit? I like the my my ISP handles dynamic IPs, your IP only changes if you are disconnected for more than a couple of days (which very rarely happens), so my IP is effectively static. Love it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorian (talk • contribs)
- Yeah - every ISP apart from AOL work like that ;) -- 9cds 15:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm surprised, I thought you were an administrator! If there is another request for you to become one, you'll get my support. --Alex9891 (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah - every ISP apart from AOL work like that ;) -- 9cds 15:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ugh, AOL is so irritating, I mean, why change the IP with EVERY page visit? I like the my my ISP handles dynamic IPs, your IP only changes if you are disconnected for more than a couple of days (which very rarely happens), so my IP is effectively static. Love it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorian (talk • contribs)
Signpost updated for July 10th
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 28 | 10 July 2006 | |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Signpost delivered by: RoyBoy 04:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Retired?
Hey, what's the deal on your user page? You're not seriously retiring are you? Budgiekiller 17:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Personal Attacks
Please don't make personal attacks on other users (), it may backfire on you - Be aware of wikilawyering. Have a nice day :) ellisjm 12:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
|
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See block log.
|
Explanation for block: This user has repeatedly asked to be blocked herself (mostly on IRC) and has crossed a final line by this edit. In the past she has vandalised several pages in order to get blocked, so I guess it's time to let her have her way. Other admins: please contact me before unblocking. I have used the new block options to limit or prevent collateral damage and will be watching for autoblocks. --JoanneB 20:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Sigh.
Well, you perservered, but this seems to be the best course of action for you. See you on IRC hopefully, best of luck to you.. --Pilotguy 01:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Category: