| Revision as of 23:20, 11 January 2015 editDavidbena (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,429 edits →Please go to the WP article "Bayt Nattif", the Talk Page there (last section): new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 12 January 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,312,104 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Jfdwolff/Archive 36) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| {{archive box collapsible|auto=no|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ],}} | {{archive box collapsible|auto=no|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ],}} | ||
| == Article "Gluten sensitivity" == | |||
| Hi Jfdwolff, would you be interested in having a look at the article on Gluten sensitivity? I have made an attempt at improving the article recently (including creating the new article on "Gluten challenge test" and removing a poorly-sourced section on this in the Gluten sensitivity article). But some parts of the article are still rather messy. In the end, I have marked the most evident problems which I could not imediately solve with "clarify" templates etc. - For example, the article speaks of "idiopathic gluten sensitivity" which is not, as far as I can see, usual terminology for any gluten sensitivity variant in mainstream medicine. As further example, the term "gluten-sensitive enteropathy" seems to be intended to be distinguished from celiac disease in an undefined way. (As a more general matter, there does not seem to be clarity so far as to whether the article should deal with gluten-related disorders in general or should focus on non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) in particular - but this may be natural given that research on NCGS is rapidly changing in the last 3 years.) In brief, if you would like to check it out, I would be pleased. --] (]) 23:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Chris Howard}} Thanks for your message. I can have a look but I am not sure if I will be able to sort this properly. GSE is classically a synonym for coeliac disease, but there is a whole territory of gluten-related pathologies that enjoy much less acceptance within the medical science community. ] stirred up a lot of discussion. | |||
| :I would personally struggle to make a diagnosis based on challenge and rechallenge, because most products containing gluten also contain lots of other substances that might be allergenic or immunogenic in some form or another. ] | ] 23:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Right. Hard to sort it out entirely properly at this point. If you could for example address the GSE wordings (clarifying the statements, if you can), substituting the expression coeliac disease wherever applicable (and deleting any statement that might seem to be nonsense), that would already be quite an improvement... --] (]) 23:28, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::FYI, I have proposed to move the NCGS part to a new article (building on a suggestion of someone else earlier). If you have an opinion about that, you may want to join in. This is just to keep you posted. --] (]) 19:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I wish you a Happy New Year! | |||
| ::::I have now expanded ] from a redirect to an article, and have moved "gluten sensitivity", after restructuring it, to the umbrella term ]. Greetings --] (]) 10:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Signpost'': 31 December 2014 == | |||
| <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2014-12-31}} | |||
| </div><!--Volume 10, Issue -1--> | |||
| <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] (]) 22:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| </div></div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=640656404 --> | |||
| == Elsevier access == | == Elsevier access == | ||
Revision as of 01:04, 12 January 2015
- New messages at the bottom, please.
- If you leave messages here, please expect a response from me over here.
- If I've left a message on your talkpage, and I'm slow to respond to a reply made there, please let me know.
Template:Archive box collapsible
Elsevier access
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Chris Troutman (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Hartog Jacob Hamburger
 | On 9 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hartog Jacob Hamburger, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Hartog Jacob Hamburger (pictured) described the chloride shift (or "Hamburger shift") in 1918? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hartog Jacob Hamburger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias 12:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2015
- In the media: ISIL propaganda video; AirAsia complaints
- Featured content: Kock up
- Traffic report: Auld Lang Syne
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Pancreatic cancer FAC
Hi, you have commented at this. I think as of now all the points on all the reviews are responded to, and either settled or awaiting a response from the reviewer (mostly the former), so you may want to revisit it. I'm sorry some of you have had to wait a while for this. There has been a lot of activity, both on this page and on the article itself, as well as the holidays. It's been great to see so many people getting involved in this. Many thanks to you and all reviewers and editors! Wiki CRUK John (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Please go to the WP article "Bayt Nattif", the Talk Page there (last section)
User:Jfdwolff, there is currently a debate between me and another editor on the WP article Bayt Nattif's Talk-Page (last section), concerning an entry there which I found inappropriate and relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Looking for your candid advice.Davidbena (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)