| Revision as of 04:11, 17 January 2015 editOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 edits →Chinese Century← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:13, 17 January 2015 edit undoOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 edits →Chinese Century: +Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| I have reverted your recent edit because the source doesn't contain anything about the period, there isn't any source that would state China as the largest economy of the world other than the 14th, 15th and 19th century. India and China were the biggest economies prior to 19th century, that's why I added that. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | I have reverted your recent edit because the source doesn't contain anything about the period, there isn't any source that would state China as the largest economy of the world other than the 14th, 15th and 19th century. India and China were the biggest economies prior to 19th century, that's why I added that. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 00:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :Looks like you already contradicted yourself, when you said it was only the 17th century. And then you claim it doesn't list the date at all, which is clearly false. Looks like you have an agenda to push in favor of India. ] (]) 03:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | :Looks like you already contradicted yourself, when you said it was only the 17th century. And then you claim it doesn't list the date at all, which is clearly false. Looks like you have an agenda to push in favor of India. ] (]) 03:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ::Check and ] You can also stop ], you will be blocked if you continued doing so. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 04:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | ::Check and ] You can also stop ], you will be blocked if you continued doing so. Also why you are adding "China" on ] when we can also say same thing for other countries like ], ], who are also assumed to be future superpower by a number of writers? ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 04:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:13, 17 January 2015
Xharm, you are invited to the Teahouse!
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Xharm! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
Chinese Century
I have reverted your recent edit because the source doesn't contain anything about the period, there isn't any source that would state China as the largest economy of the world other than the 14th, 15th and 19th century. India and China were the biggest economies prior to 19th century, that's why I added that. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like you already contradicted yourself, when you said it was only the 17th century. And then you claim it doesn't list the date at all, which is clearly false. Looks like you have an agenda to push in favor of India. Xharm (talk) 03:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Check and game somewhere else You can also stop edit warring, you will be blocked if you continued doing so. Also why you are adding "China" on Indian Century when we can also say same thing for other countries like Russia, Brazil, who are also assumed to be future superpower by a number of writers? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 04:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)