| Revision as of 07:17, 17 January 2015 editXharm (talk | contribs)156 edits You need to take your own advice and keep it on the article talk page. You're doing the same thing. And stay off my talk page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:49, 17 January 2015 edit undoOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 edits →Disruptive conduct on AfD: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ||
| == Disruptive conduct on AfD == | |||
| Stop copying comment of others. It is not a personal attack if someone is making the comment on your conduct. Neither you are allow to make a baseless conversation through copy-pasting others comment. Read ]. | |||
| *It is not necessary or desirable to reply to every comment in a discussion. | |||
| *The more often you use the same reason in a given discussion, the weaker it becomes. | |||
| You have already repeated the same point for about 3 times now, that "most of the sources don't mention the subject", and you were answered by at least 2 editors that ]. Your continued repitition of same point is only making the argument look more boring and clearly seems like you ]. Unless you can prove that the article is not notable, mentioned nowhere in any of the reliable sources, you can still continue to argue. But at this stage and for this kind of AfD I really don't see reason that why you have to continue arguing anymore. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 21:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:49, 17 January 2015
Xharm, you are invited to the Teahouse!
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Xharm! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
Disruptive conduct on AfD
Stop copying comment of others. It is not a personal attack if someone is making the comment on your conduct. Neither you are allow to make a baseless conversation through copy-pasting others comment. Read WP:BLUD.
- It is not necessary or desirable to reply to every comment in a discussion.
- The more often you use the same reason in a given discussion, the weaker it becomes.
You have already repeated the same point for about 3 times now, that "most of the sources don't mention the subject", and you were answered by at least 2 editors that AfD is not for cleanup. Your continued repitition of same point is only making the argument look more boring and clearly seems like you are not reading. Unless you can prove that the article is not notable, mentioned nowhere in any of the reliable sources, you can still continue to argue. But at this stage and for this kind of AfD I really don't see reason that why you have to continue arguing anymore. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 21:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)