| Revision as of 18:41, 16 April 2015 editWilliam Sommer (talk | contribs)593 edits add← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:41, 16 April 2015 edit undoWilliam Sommer (talk | contribs)593 edits addNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you make ] on other people, as you did at ]. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.<!-- Template:uw-npa4 --> ] (]) 08:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you make ] on other people, as you did at ]. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.<!-- Template:uw-npa4 --> ] (]) 08:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| , or it will be added to a case that you should be indefinitely blocked. ] (]) 17:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="width:95%px; background:#D0D4FF; border:0px solid #000; font-size:normal;" cellpadding="5px" | |||
| |--- | |||
| |] | |||
| |'''You have been {{#ifeq: 48 hours|ind|indefinitely|temporarily}} blocked from editing ]{{#switch: | |||
| |b= for ] | |||
| |v = for ] | |||
| |vp = for ] to the page ] | |||
| |pa = for ] | |||
| |s = for continuing to add ] links | |||
| |3= for violating the ] on ] | |||
| |o = for {{{o}}} | |||
| |sock = for violating Misplaced Pages's policy on ]}}.''' {{#switch: | |||
| |vp | |||
| |v = Page blanking, addition of random text or spam, repeated tripping of the edit filter, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of ] are considered vandalism. | |||
| |sock = Using or creating new accounts to avoid violating the ], to edit war, or avoid a ] or ] are considered violations of policies regarding sockpuppets. If you wish to contest a block, do not create new accounts to do so, please e-mail the blocking administrator instead. }}{{#ifeq: 48 hours|ind|| Your block will expire in '''48 That's clearly a typo of the word "other". Maybe you could just go and fix that? And yeah, you need to use "date=" rather than "dated=". — ] <sup>(])</sup> 20:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| : — ] <sup>(])</sup> 20:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ClaireWalzer--you should have opened a new section instead of changing what is the record.] (]) 17:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :That Claire changed the title shows that she is trying to assume good faith from you. That you changed it back shows that you are not assuming good faith (part of the reason you were blocked before). Also ]. I highly recommend changing it back, or it will be added to a case that you should be indefinitely blocked. ] (]) 17:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| No, what has happened does not work that way and you above all should know that regardless what wants to be changed. You cannot say that the Romans wish that they never crucified Jesus as an entendre to bringing him back to life. To say more is just to support your previous assessment that anything I said was a rant.] (]) 17:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | No, what has happened does not work that way and you above all should know that regardless what wants to be changed. You cannot say that the Romans wish that they never crucified Jesus as an entendre to bringing him back to life. To say more is just to support your previous assessment that anything I said was a rant.] (]) 17:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 16 April 2015
You seem to have forgotten your previous abrogation to communicate with me and I do not feel competent to do what you ask so can only do what it is that I can to identify such mistakes.William Sommer (talk) 19:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Wow. That's clearly a typo of the word "other". Maybe you could just go and fix that? And yeah, you need to use "date=" rather than "dated=". —
- You're kidding, right?— Jeraphine Gryphon 20:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- My very sentiments. It is just part of the barrage that comes with the environment right now with the board discussion. I just add it up to being the flavor of the week.William Sommer (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Why not apply it to all 'dians since the example was clearly for WP. It never said or implied as you would like for it to be characterized as such. Why not have one of the Native American group comment on your behalf.William Sommer (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
Do not post on my talk page again. ClaireWalzer (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:ClaireWalzer. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Jim1138 (talk) 08:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
, or it will be added to a case that you should be indefinitely blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
No, what has happened does not work that way and you above all should know that regardless what wants to be changed. You cannot say that the Romans wish that they never crucified Jesus as an entendre to bringing him back to life. To say more is just to support your previous assessment that anything I said was a rant.William Sommer (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Order of events:
- 1) Claire used the original heading.
- 2) Claire almost immediately changed the heading she added, as is her right according to WP:REDACT, in an attempt to show good-faith.
- 3) You changed what she wrote, which is forbidden by WP:TPO, in a petty attempt to assume bad faith (unless you meant to imply that your edits were vandalism).
- If there is something wrong here, you need to present WP:DIFFs or cite policies, instead of trying to compare yourself to Jesus. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
There is much that she could redact and didn't and to be selective is just taking a technicality to make something disappear. This is not a game of technicalities as you and other more authoritative administrators seem to relish. This is what has happened and that is restored with my move. If she wants to attempt a change then do it with a new section. You have decided what you want to do long ago and the talk page discussions show this so go ahead and use this as a confrontation personality. It just supports my finding that WP administrators that find contributors not to their liking 2015 (UTC)