| Revision as of 16:21, 25 April 2015 editAnders Feder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,552 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:26, 25 April 2015 edit undoStrivingsoul (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users841 edits →Biased sources with conflict of interest: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Tags == | == Tags == | ||
| {{ping|Ian.thomson}} FYI, an editor dropped a number of tags on the article without a valid rationale. Note that the user was recently blocked per .--] (]) 16:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC) | {{ping|Ian.thomson}} FYI, an editor dropped a number of tags on the article without a valid rationale. Note that the user was recently blocked per .--] (]) 16:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Biased sources with conflict of interest == | |||
| This article has serious problems with neutrality. Considering the book topic, having most sources belonging to the very same views and institutions that the author criticizes in the book, makes the article a worst example of bias and conflict of interest: | |||
| * 5 out of 9 references are ], the very organization that the author strongly criticizes in the book! | |||
| * Vallentine Mitchell also seems like a quite partisan Jewish pub. | |||
| * At least 4 out of 6 explicitly named authors are also Jewish. | |||
| Moreover, the article also fails to mention the political office that the author has held in the past, Louisiana House of Representative; and the history doctorate he holds. | |||
| Therefore, I added POV, one source, and ref improve tags until the article is balanced and completed by POVs of the author himself, and sources with less bias and conflict of interest. ] (]) 16:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:26, 25 April 2015
Tags
@Ian.thomson: FYI, an editor dropped a number of tags on the article without a valid rationale. Note that the user was recently blocked per ANI.--Anders Feder (talk) 16:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Biased sources with conflict of interest
This article has serious problems with neutrality. Considering the book topic, having most sources belonging to the very same views and institutions that the author criticizes in the book, makes the article a worst example of bias and conflict of interest:
- 5 out of 9 references are ADL, the very organization that the author strongly criticizes in the book!
- Vallentine Mitchell also seems like a quite partisan Jewish pub.
- At least 4 out of 6 explicitly named authors are also Jewish.
Moreover, the article also fails to mention the political office that the author has held in the past, Louisiana House of Representative; and the history doctorate he holds.
Therefore, I added POV, one source, and ref improve tags until the article is balanced and completed by POVs of the author himself, and sources with less bias and conflict of interest. Strivingsoul (talk) 16:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)