| Revision as of 21:51, 1 June 2015 view sourceCebr1979 (talk | contribs)10,843 edits LolTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:04, 9 June 2015 view source TAnthony (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors861,881 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Katherine Chancellor. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| : To send WikiLove to a user, click the red (or pink.. depending on your screen tinting) heart in the editing section where you have "Read", "Edit", etc. ''']''' ] 02:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | : To send WikiLove to a user, click the red (or pink.. depending on your screen tinting) heart in the editing section where you have "Read", "Edit", etc. ''']''' ] 02:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2015 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ]<sup>]</sup> 16:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:04, 9 June 2015
A brownie for you!
|
In an attempt to bury the hatchet, and hopefully move forward with positive and cohesion in our editing! Plus... brownies are yummy! livelikemusic 01:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you. I can't say as I've mastered the art of sending brownies quite yet so you'll have to forgive for not sending one back. Cebr1979 (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- To send WikiLove to a user, click the red (or pink.. depending on your screen tinting) heart in the editing section where you have "Read", "Edit", etc. livelikemusic 02:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
Your recent editing history at Katherine Chancellor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TAnthony 16:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)