Revision as of 21:51, 31 July 2006 editAine63 (talk | contribs)1,013 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:56, 31 July 2006 edit undoAine63 (talk | contribs)1,013 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Most Wikipedians are very devoted to seeing that the quality of the content here is sound. | *Most Wikipedians are very devoted to seeing that the quality of the content here is sound. | ||
*Most Wikipedians try to be constructive with their contributions and feedback | *Most Wikipedians try to be constructive with their contributions and feedback | ||
*Most Wikipedians are very cool, interesting people. | |||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
*Critiques of articles by Wikipedians who haven't really read the articles | *Critiques of articles by Wikipedians who haven't really read the articles | ||
*Wikipedians with long-winded critiques about what is lacking in content, the time and energy for which could have been used to contribute the content that is deemed to be lacking | *Wikipedians with long-winded critiques about what is lacking in content, the time and energy for which could have been used to contribute the content that is deemed to be lacking. | ||
:...and along these lines - Wikipedians who assert that an article is too POV if it does not represent their own personal POV. But rather than add content that represent their POV, they just keep complaining. | |||
⚫ | *Wikipedians who jump into the middle of content disagreements and make judgements or take sides without aprising themselves of the entire situation or it's history. (Wiki Admins can be some of the worst at doing this.) | ||
⚫ | *Wikipedians who jump into the middle of content disagreements and make judgements or take sides without aprising themselves of the entire situation or it's history. (Wiki Admins can be some of the worst at doing this.) | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 31 July 2006
This user thinks:
- Misplaced Pages is a wonderful platform for people to write about and discuss ideas that interest them
- Most Wikipedians are very devoted to seeing that the quality of the content here is sound.
- Most Wikipedians try to be constructive with their contributions and feedback
- Most Wikipedians are very cool, interesting people.
This user is sick of:
- Critiques of articles by Wikipedians who haven't really read the articles
- Wikipedians with long-winded critiques about what is lacking in content, the time and energy for which could have been used to contribute the content that is deemed to be lacking.
- ...and along these lines - Wikipedians who assert that an article is too POV if it does not represent their own personal POV. But rather than add content that represent their POV, they just keep complaining.
- Wikipedians who jump into the middle of content disagreements and make judgements or take sides without aprising themselves of the entire situation or it's history. (Wiki Admins can be some of the worst at doing this.)
*******************************************************************************************
With all due respect to Errol Morris, this user thinks Genghis Blues is one of the greatest documentaries ever made. Tuva or bust!