| Revision as of 00:02, 30 August 2015 editDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 edits →Please revisit: Fix link.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:41, 30 August 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,938 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Slakr/Archive 21, User talk:Slakr/Archive 22) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 22 | ||
| |algo = old(7d) | |algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Slakr/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Slakr/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| {{Archivebox|auto=long}} | {{Archivebox|auto=long}} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Thanks for your help at AIV, but...... == | |||
| Unless you have information otherwise, I think you may have misinterpreted what was going on. The 96 IP address popped up yesterday making strictly non productive edits on highway articles in the US Northeast. I am pretty sure the 50 IP address is related to an ongoing stalking issue I've been having due to the pattern of a PA on my talk combined with multiple blind reverts. This is the third or fourth time this has happened. Other IPs were in the 138 and 174 groups, along with some IPv6 addresses. I don't think 96 is related at all. ] (]) 06:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == User:SineBot adds signature even when I sign == | |||
| Hi Slark, earlier I wrote my first two sections in talk pages on the English Misplaced Pages, and I noticed that ] added the automatic signature even though I had signed. You can see this , but maybe it will add the automatic signature to this post too so as you can have a closer proof. :) --<i>]</i> ] 18:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Nevermind, I figured it by myself. I had copied the signature from the Italian version and it was redirecting to Utente:Tanonero rather than User:Tanonero. --<i>]</i> ] 18:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there! Can I still get the Manix Abrera article back? Ill cite the reference you provided. I was very poor in doing my research and cited another wiki instead. I mean no harm in creating this wiki. Thanks! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == I responded to your post == | == I responded to your post == | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 30 August 2015
|
slakr's life is currently frolicking with chaos, so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance— that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =) zOMG!!! I need urgent assistance!!!1!! — banana? — kiwi? |
Ideally, please use this link to post new messages at the bottom. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :)
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.Click here to start a new talk topic
| Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | |
|
Regarding slakr: Why did my page get deleted? Please see Misplaced Pages:Why was my page deleted? first. I have no idea what you're talking about. What's vandalism? If you received a warning from me and you're not logged in, you might have gotten an old warning I sent to someone who shares your IP address. On the other hand, if you've made recent edits and received a recent warning message from me and you genuinely believe that it's not vandalism, don't fret-- simply drop me a message below, because I could have simply made a silly mistake. :)Regarding SineBot: Why does SineBot keep signing stuff I've already signed? All comments should have a signature that includes both a link to your user page (slakr) and a datestamp (05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)) (per signatures - internal links). This is most easily generated by placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your contributions, which makes something like "slakr 05:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)".If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing. If you're still having problems after trying that, post a message below. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. I don't want my comments signed by SineBot. How do I get it to ignore me or my talk page? Please use one of the opt-out methods listed on its user page. SineBot forgot to sign something it should have signed. Usually this happens because the bot isn't sure if it really should sign something, so it defaults to not signing it (e.g., in cases of complex edits). It does this to avoid being annoying. Other times, a comment might be made when the bot is down for maintenance, so the bot simply never sees it. SineBot signed something that it genuinely should not have signed. Please let me know-- especially if you think it's not a one-time thing. Be sure to include diffs to make sure I can reference the problem. Is SineBot's source code available? Not currently. I'm signing with four tildes (~~~~) but it's still saying I didn't! You likely enabled raw signatures. Open your preferences, click the "User profile" tab, make sure that "Treat the above as wiki markup" is NOT checked, and click Save; it should be fixed. If you have an interwiki-linked user page, consider either creating a user page on enwiki that redirects to your preferred home wiki or simply opting out of automatic signing. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I responded to your post
However,
"The Internet is the last bastion of true free speech. Misplaced Pages embodies free speech at its finest. I think it does a better job at filtering fact from fiction than real life ever could. Seriously, how often can you slap a tag on someone's nonsense? How often can they slap one on you back? How often are they actually verified? Even better, we don't have to worry as much about corporate interests, liberal/conservative bias, and/or campaign contributions. Everyone keeps everyone else in check-- without guns, bombs, white ghost costumes, or other attacks. I like to learn, and I wish more people did too." -slakr
Where am I deferent from you. I only brought fact to fiction. The world said "who is the other guy on the cover, it looks like IVERSON" , but it's me.
I'm the only one who got blocked from playing in the league because I served my country. I am a victim of conservative bias. And, in trying to correct it I was told I was wrong. If you know about what Ed Obanon did so that former NBA players could be paid for use of likeness, imagine what I'm facing when I'm on the cover and DIDNT play in the NBA. That's my fight right now. I have to fight the system to be heard and I thought wiki was the place where truth gets posted and is able to stand. I'm not fully trying to use wiki as a weapon, however the more people who can FREELY ATTAIN the truth, will break down these barriers. Kaoszulu (talk) 07:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Also while there are several credited sources on the page, they all reference blog posts, magazine articles, but no actual people involved. Until I posted. Nick said I have to show a credible source. Slakr, who's more credible than the guy we know Is not doc or mike, and, if it was Allen we woulda just put his jersey on the cover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaoszulu (talk • contribs) 07:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC) Kaoszulu (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure who to ask
Slakr, I'm not sure who to ask so I thought I would ask you as you have closed a number of edit warring notices. I posted one here ]. I've seen a number of other edit war notices get closed but I've seen no review of mine one way or the other. Is there a way to know if the complaint is being reviewed? If there is a problem with the structure of the complaint can I know what it is? If this should be an ANI for disruptive editing instead of edit warring again is there a way to find out? Thanks Springee (talk) 10:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
DS alert American Politics,
Thanks for the alert, although I followed the Arb Comm proceedings and was aware of the findings, the reminder is welcome. Thanks again. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
200.83.165.120
Do not block my IP for no reason. Send a message on the talk page and discuss.
Please revisit
I noticed you closed Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Benjil_reported_by_User:Debresser_.28Result:_declined.29 as "declined". I think that result is invalid, as in not a valid option in view of the request. I explained myself there. Originally I changed the result myself to "closed without administrative action", which is a valid result in this case, but after a post on my talkpage from an editor I respect very much for many years already, I undid that, and now ask you to make this change. Debresser (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)