| Revision as of 14:40, 19 October 2015 editEpicgenius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers331,869 edits →October 2015: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:51, 19 October 2015 edit undoEpicgenius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers331,869 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Second Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line). (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| :::::::::Tdorante10 is right. There is no ''regular'' service, which is what I have been saying all this time. The doors open on the left side for all regular service trains. We don't include "Doors will open on the right" on articles like ] or ] for the same reason. ] (]) 20:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC) | :::::::::Tdorante10 is right. There is no ''regular'' service, which is what I have been saying all this time. The doors open on the left side for all regular service trains. We don't include "Doors will open on the right" on articles like ] or ] for the same reason. ] (]) 20:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| {{od}}Really? You can't prove that the express tracks aren't in revenue service, so your solution is to remove the door-opening sides altogether? You should be busy proving that the express tracks see regular trains. ] (]) 14:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | {{od}}Really? You can't prove that the express tracks aren't in revenue service, so your solution is to remove the door-opening sides altogether? You should be busy proving that the express tracks see regular trains. ] (]) 14:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You know what the deal is. You should be discussing the edit if you disagree, not keeping on reverting.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 21:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 21:51, 19 October 2015
Welcome!
Hello, 184.14.61.182, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Second Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line)
The express tracks aren't in regular use. Therefore, no trains open their doors on the express tracks. Epic Genius (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Second Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. The trains don't open their doors on the right if they are not in service. Epic Genius (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- And please stop adding back the unsourced material. There is no source that any trains do terminate there in regular service. The table shows REGULAR SERVICE trains. Epic Genius (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- You just keep making stuff up. Trains terminate there all the time, multiple times each year. Stop making stuff up! 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- "Each year" does not mean "each day." I'm talking about daily service, not one-off reroutes and Holiday Trains. Epic Genius (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly; The tracks are in service. You just proved my point that you are making stuff up. 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- "In occasional service" does not mean "in regular service," which is what it says on the table for the express tracks: "no regular service." You are ignoring my point. Epic Genius (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are not making one. You just keep removing doors open on the right, because you want this to not be an encyclopedia. You would rather it just be your opinion of the truth, regardless of if it is factual or not. Either the tracks are in service or they are not. NYCT does not remove tracks from service. Expect a train on any track, at any time. 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, lets take a breath. It's correct that the express tracks are not "out of service"; they are not decommissioned, or abandoned, or destroyed, or anything like that. It is also true that they are used from time to time and are "active" to some extent (nostalgia trains; construction reroutes; refuse/maintenance trains). But, the tracks are not in "revenue service" because no regularly scheduled "revenue" route currently uses the tracks. The last one was the V until the 2010 cuts. So, for all intents and purposes, there is no regular service to the express tracks; the diagram is relevant only to the outer "local/through" tracks for the F. If the MTA adds another permanent service (which they will not) to terminate there − a V, a K, whatever − than we can say where those trains' doors open to.Tdorante10 (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Tdorante10 is right. There is no regular service, which is what I have been saying all this time. The doors open on the left side for all regular service trains. We don't include "Doors will open on the right" on articles like Church Avenue (IND Culver Line) or Gun Hill Road (IRT White Plains Road Line) for the same reason. Epic Genius (talk) 20:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, lets take a breath. It's correct that the express tracks are not "out of service"; they are not decommissioned, or abandoned, or destroyed, or anything like that. It is also true that they are used from time to time and are "active" to some extent (nostalgia trains; construction reroutes; refuse/maintenance trains). But, the tracks are not in "revenue service" because no regularly scheduled "revenue" route currently uses the tracks. The last one was the V until the 2010 cuts. So, for all intents and purposes, there is no regular service to the express tracks; the diagram is relevant only to the outer "local/through" tracks for the F. If the MTA adds another permanent service (which they will not) to terminate there − a V, a K, whatever − than we can say where those trains' doors open to.Tdorante10 (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- You are not making one. You just keep removing doors open on the right, because you want this to not be an encyclopedia. You would rather it just be your opinion of the truth, regardless of if it is factual or not. Either the tracks are in service or they are not. NYCT does not remove tracks from service. Expect a train on any track, at any time. 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- "In occasional service" does not mean "in regular service," which is what it says on the table for the express tracks: "no regular service." You are ignoring my point. Epic Genius (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly; The tracks are in service. You just proved my point that you are making stuff up. 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- "Each year" does not mean "each day." I'm talking about daily service, not one-off reroutes and Holiday Trains. Epic Genius (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- You just keep making stuff up. Trains terminate there all the time, multiple times each year. Stop making stuff up! 184.14.61.182 (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- And please stop adding back the unsourced material. There is no source that any trains do terminate there in regular service. The table shows REGULAR SERVICE trains. Epic Genius (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Really? You can't prove that the express tracks aren't in revenue service, so your solution is to remove the door-opening sides altogether? You should be busy proving that the express tracks see regular trains. epic genius (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Second Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You know what the deal is. You should be discussing the edit if you disagree, not keeping on reverting. epic genius (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.