Misplaced Pages

Template:Ref: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:16, 6 June 2006 view sourceSpangineer (talk | contribs)Administrators16,440 editsm wording← Previous edit Revision as of 19:04, 13 August 2006 view source Mzajac (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users66,545 editsm <big>'''STOP YELLING!'''</big>Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude><big>'''Using ref/note tags is not the only way to do ]. Some people prefer to use ]. Cite.php has many advantages, but is not mandatory. You can use the ] to replace ref/note tags with the newer ] style. If you are interested in the discussion, please see the ].'''</big><br /></noinclude><span class="reference"><sup id="ref_{{{1}}}" class="plainlinksneverexpand"></sup></span><noinclude> <span class="reference"><sup id="ref_{{{1}}}" class="plainlinksneverexpand"></sup></span><noinclude>

----
Using ref/note tags is not the only way to do ]. Some people prefer to use ]. Cite.php has many advantages, but is not mandatory. You can use the ] to replace ref/note tags with the newer ] style. If you are interested in the discussion, please see the ].<noinclude>


See also: ]</noinclude> See also: ]</noinclude>

Revision as of 19:04, 13 August 2006


Using ref/note tags is not the only way to do footnotes. Some people prefer to use Cite.php. Cite.php has many advantages, but is not mandatory. You can use the Ref converter to replace ref/note tags with the newer Cite.php style. If you are interested in the discussion, please see the Footnotes talk page.

See also: Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Sources of articles

Template:Ref: Difference between revisions Add topic