Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:03, 12 July 2015 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,291 edits Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution requests is a better place to send people who have disputes and don't know where to go.← Previous edit Revision as of 17:06, 30 December 2015 edit undoGeorge Ho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,294 edits chg linksNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}} {{selfref|WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for ] (formerly WP:RFCU) or for ] (])}}
{{historical|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of {{oldid|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U|637099409|this discussion}}.'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}} {{historical|comment=<br>'''The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of ].'''<br>'''Other ] processes should be used for conduct issues.|brief=yes}}


Prior to {{oldid|Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Do Away with RFC/U|637099409|a discussion}} at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014. Prior to ] at the ] that was closed in December 2014, ] on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the ]. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014.


Old RfC/Us can be found in ]. Old RfC/Us can be found in ].

Revision as of 17:06, 30 December 2015

WP:RFC/U redirects here. You may be looking for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations (formerly WP:RFCU) or for Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User names (WP:RFC/NAME)
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
The RFC/U process has been discontinued as a result of this discussion.
Other dispute resolution processes should be used for conduct issues.

Prior to a discussion at the Village Pump that was closed in December 2014, requests for comment on user conduct (RfC/Us) were used to discuss the problematic behaviour of specific Misplaced Pages editors, as part of the dispute resolution process. RfC/Us were an informal, non-binding process. According to the discussion's closing statement, many editors found the RfC/U process ineffectual. As a result, it was closed down on 7 December 2014.

Old RfC/Us can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive.

Category:
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct: Difference between revisions Add topic