Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:58, 29 January 2016

YuHuw, you are invited to the Teahouse!

January 2016

Your recent editing history at Karait shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Karaylar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Keraites ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

The user who placed these ^ notices supports sockpuppets of User:Ancientsteppe (see User:Toghuchar) etc., while he (even if asked many times to stop such harassment) relentlessly accuses everyone else of being sockpuppets in order to canvass support against them if they touch any Karaite-related pages in any way the user does not like -e.g. clarifying helpful distinctions between Christian and Jewish groups. Since there just are too many examples just browse . All this is his apparent pretext to being elusive when invited to discuss any POV he can not justify with facts (or if his misrepresentations of facts are challenged). Even if you try to be friendly by sending him thanks for his contributions :( Some people seem simply inclined to assume bad faith against wikipedians who challenge their word views, POVs and confirmation biases. Nevertheless my hand of friendship is still open to him should he realize his error. :)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prester John, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toghrul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I have corrected it now :) YuHuw (talk) 09:31, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Misplaced Pages Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Misplaced Pages. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Misplaced Pages! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!~ Anastasia (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keraites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

"YuHuw's " ridicilious Edit Wars.

Except that his actions totallyviolates any WP rules including 3 reverts rules some of the are totaly ridicolius he also

1) He insists to to keep Dunlop's wrong translation of Keraits to Persian as Karaites Keraites page ,claiming (see Talk:Keraites) that this translation on other languages(using Kheraid) are mistaken translatioh of this English page,SO he erased the map that is "mistakenly" on all WP pages inn other languages,He claims that name Kheraid it turns out from google is only a Mongolian family name. From the other side he claims that Keraites translation as Keraitler from Turk Keraitpage is not acceptable as Original Reseearch.

2) Crimean Karaites hatnote change every time with different POV

• Here he claims that Keraites are Karailar
• Here he claims that Crimean Karaites are not ethnicity but relogious sect

3) Here he claims that translation to other languages need to be confirmed by RS. To my opinion Karaims translation in English is really misleading. I would prefer Karaims.It was decided this word after long discussion an search by google. Other Misplaced Pages pages direct to the Crimean Karaites page, including Russian page were this issue is discussed but this user is not only asks sources .It removes all Concensus translations from this page.

To be continued here or on Admin page Неполканов (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)