| Revision as of 03:33, 6 February 2016 editTryadon (talk | contribs)411 edits →User-reported← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:35, 6 February 2016 edit undoMaster of Puppets (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,455 edits →User-reported: +reNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| ::{{AIV|q}} {{reply to|Oripaypaykim}} Clarification? I'm not seeing the promotional content, and I'm not sure what the latter half of your report means. ] 03:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | ::{{AIV|q}} {{reply to|Oripaypaykim}} Clarification? I'm not seeing the promotional content, and I'm not sure what the latter half of your report means. ] 03:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::'''Non-admin comment:''' I think the reporter meant that their username is the name of a company/business/foundation/club, etc. ] (]) 03:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | :::'''Non-admin comment:''' I think the reporter meant that their username is the name of a company/business/foundation/club, etc. ] (]) 03:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Right, but that's not against any guideline or policy. ] 03:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:35, 6 February 2016
"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 04:58 on 23 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- 2601:281:d57e:18c0:71f7:42c4:99e1:c813 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale at this point. Izno (talk) 02:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Usernamed This (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- 69.121.183.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- 76.176.59.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:49, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- 118.166.147.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Tramuntana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Londinium (diff):. Disruptive editing. Changing referenced numbers without providing references. Will not stop. Dr. K. 00:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Also, not clear vandalism. Will drop a note on user's talk page. m.o.p 00:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- The number (30,000) they are trying to edit contradicts the reliable source (60,000). Imo, this is vandalism. Dr. K. 01:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Additionaly, this user has been edit-warring since 2014. Please see this edit for explanation. Dr. K. 01:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Dr.K.: What they were doing in 2014 is irrelevant; they were not warned then. While it's possible they're just trolling against sources, they may also be an inexperienced editor attempting to help or have conflicting info. They have contributed some constructive edits, so I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. Re-report if they continue despite my warning. m.o.p 03:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Kapamilya Foundation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. the block evaded of Creative raymark as found the casualty, relief operation and so on. Oripaypaykim (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Question: @Oripaypaykim: Clarification? I'm not seeing the promotional content, and I'm not sure what the latter half of your report means. m.o.p 03:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: I think the reporter meant that their username is the name of a company/business/foundation/club, etc. Tryadon (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Right, but that's not against any guideline or policy. m.o.p 03:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- Non-admin comment: I think the reporter meant that their username is the name of a company/business/foundation/club, etc. Tryadon (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)