Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:17, 4 March 2016 view sourceJayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits Undid revision 708281578 by BESTEDITORRR (talk) revert malformed request from new user. Will take care of with protection.← Previous edit Revision as of 18:40, 4 March 2016 view source Volunteer Marek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers94,173 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 414: Line 414:
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ --> <!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
*'''Result:''' Semiprotected ] six months, due to an IP-hopping edit warrior. Let me know if he moves on to other articles. For background see ]. The IPs come from RackBank Data Centers in India. You might consider reporting them at ] to see if a {{tl|webhostblock}} may be justified. There is a chance that all the PavelStaykov socks come from webhosts. ] (]) 15:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC) *'''Result:''' Semiprotected ] six months, due to an IP-hopping edit warrior. Let me know if he moves on to other articles. For background see ]. The IPs come from RackBank Data Centers in India. You might consider reporting them at ] to see if a {{tl|webhostblock}} may be justified. There is a chance that all the PavelStaykov socks come from webhosts. ] (]) 15:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Macaque}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
#
#

This article is under a 1RR restriction. When you click "edit this page" a big warning shows up which explicitly states ''"Editors are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction when reverting logged-in users on all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. When in doubt, assume it is related, and don't revert."'' So the user is well aware of the restriction. They are also well aware of it because they've been notified .

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and . Five days, two threads, no response on talk.

<u>Comments:</u> <br />

I'm also having trouble understanding the user's edit summaries which are close to being incomprehensible. In addition, the actual text changes and reverts, also mangle the grammar in the process.] (]) 18:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->

Revision as of 18:40, 4 March 2016

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.


    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.
    Click here to create a new report
    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358
    359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167
    1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481
    482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337
    338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347
    Other links

    Dean1997 reported by User:Rebbing (Result: Warned)

    Page
    Cara Delevingne (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Dean1997 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 707646391
    2. 706000510
    3. 705030925
    4. 705029804
    5. 705027252
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 706028706
    2. 705483553
    Comments:

    This user has been persistently disruptive in adding a specific piece of information to this article against consensus and refuses to discuss the matter on the talk page despite repeated, specific warnings on his page. (He's also abused the minor edit flag in an apparent attempt to evade scrutiny.)  Rebbing  talk  02:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

    Interestingly, he left me an apology on my talk page this morning.  Rebbing  talk  14:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:100.43.29.68 reported by User:Jess (Result: blocked)

    Page
    William Lane Craig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    100.43.29.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 21:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
    2. 21:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
    3. 21:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talkpage. Stop edit warring."
    4. 06:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "See talk. Do not edit war."
    5. 05:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 707273685 by Jess (talk)"
    6. 3:59, 27 February 2016 "see talk"
    7. 00:31, 27 February 2016 "Please see Talkpage. Two people in favor of this edit. One against. Many sources were posted in favor of this edit. Stop edit waring and place discuss the issue at the Talkpage. Thank you."
    8. 21:49, 26 February 2016 "This has been discussed on the Talkpage. I see two people are who are for this edit and one against. There are also numerous citations in favor of Craig being labeled a Philosopher first and foremost"
    9. 06:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706228630 by Jess (talk)"
    10. 04:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706197407 by Jess (talk)"
    11. 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 706081604 by Theroadislong (talk)"
    12. 07:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC) "Craig is as much of a philosopher as Plantinga or Dennett. Go look at Dennett's article and notice how he isn't referred to as an "Atheist Philosopher". Look at Plantinga's article and notice how he isn't referred to as a "Christian Philosopher"."
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 05:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on William Lane Craig. (TW)"
    2. 07:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "+violation of WP:3RR warning"


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 22:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC) "/* What's a " Christian Analytic philosopher"? & The Ordering of The Lead Revisited */ Reply"
    2. 01:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC) "/* What's an "analytic Christian Philosopher"? */ Reply"
    Comments:

    Editor will not stop edit warring. IP appears to be static. He broke 3rr on Feb 22, but the page was protected instead of issuing a block. As soon as page came off protection, he began edit warring again. Page was protected again for 2 days. As soon as it came off protection, he's at it again. We either need a longer semi protection, or a block to show the ip that he is not allowed to edit war.

    Incidentally, note the content being reverted has been extensively discussed over the last several years. See, for example, this edit and the talk page.   — Jess· Δ 14:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

    Note, ip is now at 5 reverts in 24 hours. He has been edit warring on this nonstop since Feb 22nd. Either a block, or longer-term semi protection will be necessary to stop the disruption.   — Jess· Δ 21:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    Also they have reverted three different editors. --‖ Ebyabe - Repel All Boarders21:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    6 actually. Jess, Ebyabe, Anaxial, Epipelagic, Boomer Vial, Theroadislong.   — Jess· Δ 01:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:71.174.127.111 reported by User:RolandR (Result: protected)

    Page
    Jewish Bolshevism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    71.174.127.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts


    1. 16:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "As previosly pointed out it is hard to get consensus when the material on the talk page gets deleted. and one more time - The new Churchill material is from the same source as the Churchill material already in the article."
    2. 16:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "As previosly pointed out it is hard to get consensus when the material on the talk page gets deleted."
    3. 16:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source as the previously included Churchill material - I'd be a bit more receptive to your complaint if so much material was not being deleted from the talk pagel"
    4. 16:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source a previously included Churchill material"
    5. 16:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "New Churchill material is from the same source a previously included Churchill material"
    6. 16:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Then YOU link it to the wiki duplicate already used as a cite."
    7. 15:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Now sourced with a link to the actual article - not to some wiki duplicate which can be vandalized"
    8. 15:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Not unsourced - its from the same source as the already existing Churchill material"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

    Here


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    IP edit-warring with at least four established editors to add antisemitic material sourced to utterly unreliable fringe and Nazi sources RolandR (talk) 16:13, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:Mariasfixing reported by User:331dot (Result:Blocked )

    Page
    Charlene McMann (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Mariasfixing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 19:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */"
    2. 19:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */ information already put on before. This woman is suicidal, her husband is a lawyer, he will need to contact you if anything happens to her has reports from Dr's, her lawyer. She worked 18 years helping cancer patients volunteering"
    3. 19:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Chicago Sun Times is a political hack for Chicago Politics and damaged Ms McMann on person. This is not a joke! She is suicidal. Her husband is a attorney and this press is effecting her mental and physical status.psychiatrist evalue says she was suicidal"
    4. 18:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Felony Conviction */ the sources not reliable. Her attorney put a press release saying she was politically targeted if it was held where she lives no charges would have been filed. She has mental - physical health issues and was suicidal cause of this"
    5. 18:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "The sources are not reliable and there was a press release from attorney stating she was politically targeted and if it held in her county twould not be any charges filed and would have been dismissed. He said she is mentally and physically to"
    6. 18:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "reputation destruction. Woman is under mental and physical stress which can cause hareful results to her health. Her lawyer had a press release saying she was politically targeted the county were she lives would be no charges filed dismissed"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 19:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Charlene McMann. (TW)"
    2. 19:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Charlene McMann. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 19:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Dispute */ new section"
    Comments:

    Edit war seems to be over mentioning a criminal conviction in the article. Mariasfixing has not replied on talk page to post their concerns(aside from a few edit summaries) 331dot (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

    I have blocked for 12 hours. -- John Reaves 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
    The person has returned and has resumed edit warring. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
    Page protected @Coffee: has protected the article for 1 week. I have removed the content in contention as I believe our protection policy suggests to err on the side of exclusion in a BLP dispute. (Note: I have no particular opinion on whether the content should stay or go; I am simply doing what I believe policy should say I ought to do). I am extremely concerned about this edit summary and have emailed emergency about it. Ritchie333 14:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:Aniseseed reported by User:JJMC89 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

    Page
    Ferdinand Marcos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Aniseseed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 07:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 06:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. 22:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    4. 21:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    5. 15:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    6. 14:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 06:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Ferdinand Marcos. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    User:2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC reported by User:忍者ポップ (Result: Both blocked)

    Page: Doubutsu Sentai Zyuohger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. Undid revision 708025006 by 忍者ポップ (talk) These terms aren't needed on this page anymore. Please stop reverting me.

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Comments:
    Pages. --忍者ポップ (talk) 04:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    忍者ポップ was reverting me without explaining why. I kept trying to talk to him but he removed all of my messages and would not leave a reason why he was reverting.--2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk) 04:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    Japanese user not block, IP block. --忍者ポップ (talk) 04:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    You started it. You did not explain why you reverted me when I have left multiple explanations for my edits.--2601:140:8200:DE:CC43:A3F3:6D4A:5BDC (talk) 04:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    Both editors blocked – 24 hours. User:忍者ポップ speaks in sentence fragments that make little sense, though he identifies with the en-3 user box ('advanced knowledge of English'). He should reflect on how effective he can be here, especially in negotiating contested matters. EdJohnston (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:Ashur4ever reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: )

    Page
    Kirkuk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Ashur4ever (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 04:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    2. 04:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    3. Consecutive edits made from 02:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) to 03:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
      1. 02:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
      2. 03:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      3. 03:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      4. 03:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      5. 03:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      6. 03:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      7. 03:36, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      8. 03:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      9. 03:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    4. Consecutive edits made from 23:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) to 23:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
      1. 23:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      2. 23:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
    5. Consecutive edits made from 23:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC) to 23:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
      1. 23:07, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
      2. 23:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC) ""
      3. 23:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Demographics */"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 04:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Kirkuk. (TWTW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    SPA POV edits on Kirkuk. Blanking, apparent vandalism, removal of sources. Will not stop. Dr. K. 04:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:68.231.26.111 reported by User:Spirit Ethanol (Result: Both blocked )

    Page
    Portal:Current events/2016 February 26 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    68.231.26.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 00:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 707941008 by Spirit Ethanol (talk)"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    Comments:

    Highly destructive editor. Continuously removing U.S. election news on several pages such as here here (January 28) here (March 1) here (March 2), and then reverting re-additions (Much more than three...). Refusing to communicate. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    my defence is as follows - how many stupid admins exist at wiki? - one after another after another - the above user is a sockpuppet created just last Nov 2015 - I am almost certain it is just more of this sockpuppet in one of all his hundreds of block evasion activities creating endless accounts to war at wiki - he is as follows: ((WP:BLOCK EVASION edits removed https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Spliff_Joint_Blunt/Archive)) - as usual he expects that some idiot admin will fall for it again and again and again - and guess what?, it works every time!!!--68.231.26.111 (talk) 09:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:Kordestani reported by User:Tradedia (Result: Protected)

    Page: Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Kordestani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Breaking 1RR:

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War#ISIS offensive against SDF in north countryside of Raqqa & Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War#Vandalism,Unreliable sources,Misinterpreation of sources,Breaking the rules of editing

    Comments:
    The article on which the edit warring occurred is subject to Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. And the user being reported has been placed on notice of the remedies in place. After a 1 week block for edit warring by admin EdJohnston, this user found nothing better than to come back and edit war some more on the module, breaking 1RR. Moreover, you can notice that one day before he engaged in the 1RR violation, an edit warring template was left on his talk page by admin Lectonar concerning a different article. Tradedia 09:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    Comment: He did break 3RR (or 1RR)? but his edits were based on sources, so I wouldn't call it unconstructive, though it is disruptive. He's a relatively new user and is doing some good stuff keeping Module:Turkish Insurgency Detailed Map (where he has actually been quite neutral despite frequent Turkish POV vandalism) in order. Anyway, I firmly believe he's here to build an encylopedia, and I'd attribute the rule-breaking to inexperience or impulsiveness (though I guess I'm a bit biased towards sympathy in that respect considering my own foibles). --Monochrome_Monitor 12:32, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    Page protected – 5 days. EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:Mambojazz1 reported by User:Mscuthbert (Result: Blocked)

    Page
    Isaiah Richardson Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Mambojazz1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 17:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "Again. Please READ THE ACTUAL ARTICLES!!!! Isaiah Richardson Jr's music has absolutely no relation to tourists. He has studied languages his entire life and grew up in Asia part of his life. He has been playing Jewish music since age 13 at Juilliard!"
    2. 16:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "missing information as well as false information"
    3. 16:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "added pertinate information. Still much missing"
    4. 19:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Lies"
    5. 19:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC) "Lies"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 17:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "User warning for unconstructive editing found using STiki"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    Reversion after User:Voceditenore gave final warning on user page. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    • I am tempted to punt on this right now thanks to Voceditenore's fixes that have made a nice, readable stub. I'll leave the report open and if Mambojazz1 reverts it all back before the end of the day, I think a block could be considered. Ritchie333 19:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    Blocked – 31 hours by User:Jayron32. EdJohnston (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    Electricburst1996 reported by User:Cebr1979

    Page
    Plushophilia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Electricburst1996 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4

    Though it started before that with these other reverts as well:

    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Comments:

    This user feels strongly about an image but, regardless of having been shown/told why the image is there, they are resorting to edit warring to get their way... despite knowing full well that edit warring is wrong: 1, 2, 3, 4.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    A notice was placed on their talk page but, immediately removed so am @Electricburst1996: pinging them here now.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:49, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    ...and now they have removed this whole notice from this very board!Cebr1979 (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    This case involves more than two editors. Four editors were involved, actually. Oh, and may I mention that Cebr1979 has a long-term history of personal attacks against other users? ElectricBurst(Zaps) 23:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
    The number of editors has nothing to do with anything. We're talking about the number of editors who have broken the very serious 3RR rule... and that's only you. I have never issued a personal attack towards you so I'm not sure why you brought that up, it has nothing to do with anything either. However, you deleting posts by others in order to suit your needs does have something to do with something because... you've done that before and have been told it's wrong: 1, 2.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

    I'd like to note that the diff provided for dispute resolution doesn't tell the entire story. The current diff for resolution could also be considered as this under the RfC heading. Electricburst1996 has agreed to consider a compromise, which is showing a willingness to work with other editors. He's also agreed to leave the existing image and article alone in good faith while I look for a more suitable image. Any punishment from this seems like it would just be punitive, since discussion appears to have yielded positive results. Note: This comment is saying nothing about his removal of this report or behavior outside of the article and associated talk page, but I believe those issues are better handled elsewhere. --Lithorien 01:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    Huh? Your diff for resolution didn't even exist when I filed this report (and there's no way you couldn't have known that when you came here since you had only made it 11 minutes prior). "He's also agreed to leave the existing image and article alone in good faith" is not good faith since he only agreed to that after being notified on his talk page of this very notice (and responded with a personal attack, I might add... an accusation he is quick to constantly throw at others). In regards to everything else, none of that happened until after this was filed either! As for the deleting, that can/maybe will go to ANI later, ya. It wasn't part of the case (nor did I imply it was), I was merely pointing it out/reminding the user of it so as to prevent him attempting it again. While it's great you notified this board of the outcome, your post really is bizarre.Cebr1979 (talk) 02:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
    ...and I hadn't even noticed until now that Bjelleklang just recently blocked the reported user for edit warring as well.Cebr1979 (talk) 02:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
    Just an outside comment: "just recently" = over 13 months ago. only (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
    Oh, right! Didn't notice the year. Have stricken, thank you!Cebr1979 (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:VanEman reported by User:Apriestofgix (Result: )

    Page
    Frederick Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    VanEman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. Consecutive edits made from 00:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC) to 00:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
      1. 00:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "Undid revision 708143556 by Apriestofgix (talk) birth name usually mentioned in first line of early life."
      2. 00:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Early life */ Correct punctuation"
    2. 21:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Early life */ birth name Trumpf"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 00:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Frederick Trump */"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 00:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC) "/* Trumpf */"
    Comments:

    User continues to make edits that have been discussed on the Talk page and not adopted due to a lack of sources, or conflicting sources that have resulted in not adding that content to the main article. Apriestofgix (talk) 00:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:79.27.106.92 reported by User:Binksternet (Result: )

    Page: Santo & Johnny (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 79.27.106.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. – 19:13, 3 March. Restoring Nikka Costa after being reverted.
    2. – 06:52, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.
    3. – 07:37, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.
    4. – 08:41, 4 March. Restoring Nikka Costa.

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: None.

    Comments:

    With this edit on 1 March, Catania IP 82.53.45.90 began inserting Nikka Costa into this article. The Catania person changed to IP 79.27.106.92 on 3 March. Both IPs are promoting Nikka Costa, and the more recent one has inserted hoax material at the Nikka Costa biography, saying that her father was shot to death by a famous killer (rather than dying of chronic heart problems.) The hoaxing, the excessive promotion and the edit warring make this person disruptive to Misplaced Pages. Binksternet (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    User:103.27.235.22, 103.27.235.24, 103.27.235.25 reported by User:Crovata (Result: Semi)

    Page: Oghur languages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 103.27.235.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 103.27.235.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 103.27.235.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. - add of the pseudoscientific theory Sun Language Theory, IP 103.27.235.22
    2. - same, but now IP 103.27.235.24
    3. - same, but now IP 103.27.235.25
    4. - 4th revert by IP 103.27.235.24
    5. - placed speedy deletion template IP 103.27.235.24
    6. - reverted template IP 103.27.235.25
    7. - reverted template IP 103.27.235.22
    8. - extended template IP 103.27.235.22
    9. - 4th revert by IP 103.27.235.22
    10. - 17th edit overall by IPs

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: none, only through edit summary, due to resemblance to a previous sockpuppets

    Comments:There are used intentionally three different IPs so could evade block because of 3RR, and continue doing disruptive edits, like Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/PavelStaykov#13 February 2016. The connections with a pseudoscientific theory, although are a real branch of Turkic languages, are based on OR and that Hunnic wasn't Turkic (similar POV like PavelStaykov socks).

    User:Macaque reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: )

    Page: Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Macaque (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    This article is under a 1RR restriction. When you click "edit this page" a big warning shows up which explicitly states "Editors are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction when reverting logged-in users on all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. When in doubt, assume it is related, and don't revert." So the user is well aware of the restriction. They are also well aware of it because they've been notified .

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and . Five days, two threads, no response on talk.

    Comments:

    I'm also having trouble understanding the user's edit summaries which are close to being incomprehensible. In addition, the actual text changes and reverts, also mangle the grammar in the process.Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

    Categories:
    Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions Add topic