Revision as of 04:21, 20 October 2015 edit2602:306:c5b4:e3d0:c849:153c:837f:8143 (talk) →sources: c← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:15, 9 March 2016 edit undoFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits →Gimme a break: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20040223_lytton.html | * http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20040223_lytton.html | ||
:Is the NRA a reliable source or best available source for gun control articles? How about Mother Jones? The Brady Campaign? ] (]) 04:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC) | :Is the NRA a reliable source or best available source for gun control articles? How about Mother Jones? The Brady Campaign? ] (]) 04:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Gimme a break == | |||
<i>After years of mixed success in their efforts enact gun control via legislation, gun control advocates attempted to coerce gun manufacturers and dealers into implementing measures to avoid lawsuits that could put them out of business.<ref name=Munoz>Munoz, S. Media Matters, December 19, 2012.</ref></i> | |||
That ain't what the source says. C'mon guys, at least try to be neutral. ] (]) 19:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:15, 9 March 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Firearms Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Interpretation of importance
I deleted "showing that many Democrats were able to abandon (at least temporarily) their party's traditional support of anti-gun legislation in favor of this bill" because that interpretation is subjective and open to debate. We should leave it to the reader to determine what bipartisan support for the law means.
--151.203.24.205 17:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
sources
Here are some sources I plan on using to expand this article (some are not RS, they are just used as reminders or because they contain tidbits I want to try and source) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- https://books.google.com/books?id=RATyep8nF7EC&pg=PA5196&lpg=PA5196&dq=%22eliot+spitzer%22+glock+bankruptcy+lawyers+door&source=bl&ots=u--Bbx-IYR&sig=0WPC_yKx3nNG9l5igxzaBkvm9Jg&hl=en&ei=8oC4TOu4KsH6lweG4vS5DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22eliot%20spitzer%22%20glock%20bankruptcy%20lawyers%20door&f=false
- http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB947635315729229622
- http://volokh.com/posts/1242074620.shtml
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2012/12/18/bushmaster-paid-after-malvo-killings-and-may-yet-pay-again/
- http://www.cato.org/blog/andrew-cuomo-gunmaker-litigation
- https://reason.com/archives/2000/06/01/a-smith-wesson-faq
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nra-backed-federal-limits-on-gun-lawsuits-frustrate-victims-their-attorneys/2013/01/31/a4f101da-69b3-11e2-95b3-272d604a10a3_story.html
- http://gawker.com/the-second-amendment-is-not-what-protects-gun-dealers-a-1734663695
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/10/bernie-sanders-misleading-characterization-of-a-controversial-gun-law/
- http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/10/06/446348616/fact-check-are-gun-makers-totally-free-of-liability-for-their-behavior
- http://time.com/4073848/gun-control-lawsuits-milwaukee/
- http://freebeacon.com/issues/federal-judge-orders-brady-center-to-pay-ammo-dealers-legal-fees-after-dismissing-lawsuit/
- http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/hillary-clinton-unveil-plan-major-new-gun-restrictions-n438361
- http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/state/3044-gun-control-and-the-new-federal-law-shielding-gun-manufacturers-from-lawsuits
- http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/?epi_menuItemID=c0935b9a57bb4ef3daf2f1c701c789a0&epi_menuID=13ecbf46556241d3daf2f1c701c789a0&epi_baseMenuID=27579af732d48f86a62fa24601c789a0&pageID=mayor_press_release&catID=1194&doc_name=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyc.gov%2Fhtml%2Fom%2Fhtml%2F2005b%2Fpr401-05.html&cc=unused1978&rc=1194&ndi=1
- http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20040223_lytton.html
- Is the NRA a reliable source or best available source for gun control articles? How about Mother Jones? The Brady Campaign? 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:C849:153C:837F:8143 (talk) 04:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Gimme a break
After years of mixed success in their efforts enact gun control via legislation, gun control advocates attempted to coerce gun manufacturers and dealers into implementing measures to avoid lawsuits that could put them out of business. That ain't what the source says. C'mon guys, at least try to be neutral. Felsic2 (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Munoz, S. Why Isn't The Media Discussing The Unprecedented Law Giving Gun Makers And Dealers Immunity? Media Matters, December 19, 2012.