| Revision as of 04:36, 10 March 2016 editFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits Undid revision 434305145 by 184.218.248.246 (talk) no explanation← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:43, 10 March 2016 edit undoFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits →Right to bear arms: cut crappy content written for a class by a guy who didn't have a clue how to write for WPNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| This amendment was legally controversial until a Supreme Court case in 2008. In the '']'' case, the Second Amendment and its relation to gun control laws in the District of Columbia were evaluated by the Supreme Court for the first time in 70 years. The court decided that the Second Amendment did not grant the right to keep and bear arms solely to a military force, but to private citizens as well. The Court held that "he Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home" -''District of Columbia v. Heller'', 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008).<ref>'']'', (2008).</ref><ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/</ref> | This amendment was legally controversial until a Supreme Court case in 2008. In the '']'' case, the Second Amendment and its relation to gun control laws in the District of Columbia were evaluated by the Supreme Court for the first time in 70 years. The court decided that the Second Amendment did not grant the right to keep and bear arms solely to a military force, but to private citizens as well. The Court held that "he Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home" -''District of Columbia v. Heller'', 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008).<ref>'']'', (2008).</ref><ref>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/</ref> | ||
| Statute laws regarding the keeping and bearing of arms vary by state. Different states have made provisions to this right throughout history, generally regarding the issue of self-defense. A majority of state constitutions allow arms for any citizen in self-defense of himself or the state. <ref>http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/statecon.htm</ref> States without any specific provisions regarding this clause are California, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey and New York. Of these, only Iowa and New Jersey provide a clause for "defending life and liberty." <ref>http://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=841#With</ref> | |||
| This civil liberty can be approached philosophically as well as lawfully. What does the word "arms" exactly mean? What does the word "bear" mean in this specific statement? The word "bear" means to carry or to hold. The word "arms" means, weapons, but not necessarily firearms specifically. When these words are used together, "bear arms" could most likely be interpreted by some as a right to carry firearms outside of one's home. The topic of whether firearms were or were not able to be carried outside the home was not addressed in the District of Columbia v. Heller court case. | |||
| "The lawyer who won the Columbia v Heller court case to allow residents to keep handguns in their homes is now fighting to allow residents and visitors to carry their firearms in public." <ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080702997.html | work=The Washington Post | first=Keith L. | last=Alexander | title=Lawsuit Seeks Right to Carry Concealed Weapons in the District | date=August 8, 2009}}</ref> While it is legal to carry a concealed firearm in other select states, it is still prohibited in the District of Columbia. | |||
| ==Sexual freedom== | ==Sexual freedom== | ||
Revision as of 04:43, 10 March 2016
Liberties of the United States are certain inalienable rights retained by (as opposed to privileges granted to) citizens of the United States under the Constitution of the United States, as interpreted and clarified by the Supreme Court of the United States and lower federal courts. Civil liberties are simply defined as individual legal and constitutional protections from entities more powerful than an individual, for example, parts of the government, other individuals, or corporations. The liberties explicitly defined, make up the Bill of Rights, including freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and the right to privacy. There are also many liberties of people not defined in the Constitution, as stated in the Ninth Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Additional liberties are defined in the Preamble: the "right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness."
The extent of civil liberties and the periphery of the population of the United States who had access to these liberties has expanded over time. For example, the Constitution did not originally define who was eligible to vote, allowing each state to determine who was eligible. In the early history of the U.S., most states allowed only white male adult property owners to vote (about 6% of the population). The 'Three-Fifths Compromise' allowed the southern slaveholders to consolidate power and maintain slavery in America for eighty years after the ratification of the Constitution. And the Bill of Rights had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.
Freedom of speech
Main article: Freedom of speech in the United StatesFreedom of speech is a civil liberty protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted on December 15, 1791.
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This civil liberty grants all United States citizens the right to express themselves and enjoy the expression of others without interference of the government. This freedom of expression is often tested and can be the center of controversy because of how it is interpreted. The courts have recognized the Bill of Rights as having the intention of rights of privacy and the separation of church and state, even though it is not clearly stated. It is also thought that the amendment refers only to government interference, which leads to individual corporations and businesses violating these freedoms.
The following types of speech are not protected constitutionally: defamation or false statements, child pornography, obscenity, damaging the national security interests, verbal acts, and fighting words. Because these categories fall outside of the First Amendment privileges, the courts can legally restrict or criminalize any expressive act within them. Other expressions, including threat of bodily harm or publicizing illegal activity, may also be ruled illegal.
Right to bear arms
The right of the people to keep and bear arms is assured by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution:
- A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
This amendment was legally controversial until a Supreme Court case in 2008. In the District of Columbia v. Heller case, the Second Amendment and its relation to gun control laws in the District of Columbia were evaluated by the Supreme Court for the first time in 70 years. The court decided that the Second Amendment did not grant the right to keep and bear arms solely to a military force, but to private citizens as well. The Court held that "he Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home" -District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008).
Sexual freedom
The concept of sexual freedom includes a broad range of different rights we are granted that are not listed in the U.S. Constitution. The following liberties are included under sexual freedom: sexual expression, sexual choices, sexual education, reproductive justice, and sexual health. Sexual freedom in general is considered a kind of freedom of association and does not have a separate category of its own in the Constitution.
Sexual freedoms include the freedom to have consensual sex with whomever a person chooses, at any time, for any reason, provided the person is of the age of majority. Marriage is not required, nor are there any requirements as to the gender or number of people you have sex with. Sexual freedom includes the freedom to have private consensual homosexual sex (Lawrence v. Texas).
Equal protection
Main article: Equal Protection ClauseEqual protection prevents the government from creating laws that are discriminatory in application or effect.
See also
References
- http://www.ontheissues.org/askme/civil_liberties.htm
- http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/civil-rights-basics/civil-rights-vs-liberties.html
- http://www.ontheissues.org/askme/civil_liberties.htm
- "Expansion of Rights and Liberties - The Right of Suffrage". Online Exhibit: The Charters of Freedom. National Archives. Retrieved April 21, 2015.
- "U.S. Voting Rights". Infoplease. Retrieved April 21, 2015.
- "Voting in Early America". Colonial Williamsburg. Spring 2007. Retrieved April 21, 2015.
- "We Hold These Truths to be Self-evident;" An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Roots of Racism & slavery in America Kenneth N. Addison; Introduction P. xxii
- "The Bill Of Rights: A Brief History". ACLU. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
- http://www.civilliberties.org/billof.html
- http://www.firstamendment.com/firstamendment.php
- District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct. 2783 (2008).
- http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/
- http://www.glaa.org/archive/2010/woodhullreport1019.pdf
Further reading
- Alexander, Keith L. Lawsuit Seeks Right to Carry Concealed Weapons in the District. Www.washingtonpost.com. The Washington Post, 8 Aug. 2009. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
- American Civil Liberties Union. ACLU.org. n.d. Web. 27 Sept. 2009.
- FindLaw. First Amendment - Religion and Expression. FindLaw for Legal Professionals. FindLaw, 2009. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
- Gordon, Jesse. Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights. OnTheIssues.org. Ed. Jesse Gordon. Jesse Gordon, 3 Aug. 2000. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
- Scalia, Antonin. District of Columbia v. Heller. Oyez.org. The US Supreme Court Media, June 2008. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.