Misplaced Pages

User talk:Saheehinfo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:59, 27 March 2016 edit49.195.44.189 (talk) MAWLID← Previous edit Revision as of 16:34, 29 March 2016 edit undoSaheehinfo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users558 edits don't post here againNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
|box-advert=yes |box-advert=yes
}} }}

== MAWLID ==

Adding well cited info and a clearer layout doesn't need to be taken to the talk page. Your wholesale removal of content only shows that you seek to remove content that doesn't agree with your prejudices. Taking my case to the talk page is unnecessary, and i highly doubt you are sincere in seeking a solution through discsussion. If you want to remove well cited content then the impetus is upon you to justify its rejection. So i ask you to go to the talk page and state your excuses first. ] (]) 13:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

So once again i undid your edit that you backed-up with a baseless excuse: "Sources such as Stephen Schwartz and the Jewish publication society are unreliable per WP:IRS". Can you please provide evidence, specifically, that Stephen Schwartz and the Jewish publication are unreliable? It is quite easy to throw around wiki policy; it is another thing to actually have substance behind your claims. Schwartz is a notable author on Islamic topics and the Jewish publication society is also notable and publishes many reliable works. Anyway, your insincere intentions are quite clear: you removed my whole edit, that involved many different references, even though you raised issue with only one reference (Stephen Schwartz and its Jewish publication). Your agenda appears to be an attempt to whitewash Mawlid as a celebration that was instituted since the earliest of times with a very limited number of groups who oppose it; however, this is far from the truth, and i will be actively editing this article over the coming days to give it greater balance and accuracy. If you keep to your baseless removal of content i will report you to be blocked. Cheers. ] (]) 22:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:34, 29 March 2016


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.
User talk:Saheehinfo: Difference between revisions Add topic