| Revision as of 01:46, 28 April 2016 editHebel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,369 edits →Duke of Albany← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:31, 28 April 2016 edit undoBlueMoonlet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,548 edits →Duke of Albany: Reply elsewhereNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Hello ] I disagree with your edits on articles about the Dukes of Albany. The legislation is very clear. People who needed permission for their marriages under the Royal Marriages Act 1772 and not obtain them have conducted marriages that can have no consequences under British Law. This has recently been discussed again on . I'm going to revert your edits for now, awaiting a secondary source that indeed explicitly puts the question in doubt. ] (]) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC) | Hello ] I disagree with your edits on articles about the Dukes of Albany. The legislation is very clear. People who needed permission for their marriages under the Royal Marriages Act 1772 and not obtain them have conducted marriages that can have no consequences under British Law. This has recently been discussed again on . I'm going to revert your edits for now, awaiting a secondary source that indeed explicitly puts the question in doubt. ] (]) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :The matter was furthermore clearly demonstrated when the ] conducted a legal marriage in contravention of the Royal Marriages act 1772. His sons were not only excluded from the succession to the throne but were also not eligible to inherit his peerages. In other places on[REDACTED] this is mentioned and .] (]) 01:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC) | :The matter was furthermore clearly demonstrated when the ] conducted a legal marriage in contravention of the Royal Marriages act 1772. His sons were not only excluded from the succession to the throne but were also not eligible to inherit his peerages. In other places on[REDACTED] this is mentioned and .] (]) 01:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::Conversation continues ]. --] (]/]) 17:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:31, 28 April 2016
Welcome to my talk page. Please email me for anything that requires prompt attention.
Please click here to leave a message.
Duke of Albany
Hello User:BlueMoonlet I disagree with your edits on articles about the Dukes of Albany. The legislation is very clear. People who needed permission for their marriages under the Royal Marriages Act 1772 and not obtain them have conducted marriages that can have no consequences under British Law. This has recently been discussed again on this talk page. I'm going to revert your edits for now, awaiting a secondary source that indeed explicitly puts the question in doubt. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- The matter was furthermore clearly demonstrated when the 2nd Duke of Cambridge conducted a legal marriage in contravention of the Royal Marriages act 1772. His sons were not only excluded from the succession to the throne but were also not eligible to inherit his peerages. In other places on[REDACTED] this is mentioned here and here.Gerard von Hebel (talk) 01:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Conversation continues here. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 17:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)