Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:06, 12 July 2016

User:Malik Shabazz/Tabs

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days

FAC: Agharta (album)

Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing or commenting at this FAC nomination for Agharta (album)? More input would be appreciate, as it appears the original reviewer has bailed. Dan56 (talk) 04:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dan56. I'll take a look at it over the weekend. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 02:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dan56. I'm sorry. I never got around to reviewing the article. I'll look at it this week or next weekend. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 03:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

It's ok. A few reviews have been completed so far, so it's not a problem. Dan56 (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I was looking at your recent edit at

Letters from Russian Prisons, noticing int he picture of the cover that th "F" in "from" is in capitols and then went looking at the history of the article and was sr=urprised to discover that I did not start the article, when I was pretty sure I did. Food for thought. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Now when I look at it, I did start it. I am so confused. Carptrash (talk) 06:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Carptrash. Yesterday, an editor added a link to an online copy of the book, and I got a little carried away. Regarding the capitalization of "from", MOS:CT says it shouldn't be capitalized unless it's the first or last word of the title. — MShabazz /_Stalk 11:27, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Oh I am very happy with your work there, including the title, it's just something odd happened when I looked at the history and I panicked. Somehow I was looking at the wrong article's history. The real history is interesting in that you arrived at the article the same day I published it, five years ago. Carptrash (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Max Blumethal

I just posted the information that seems to make you biased and unqualified to make decisions about Max Blumenthal's page considering the fact that you are ideologically aligned with him and thus defend him

Please don't use Misplaced Pages as a propaganda platform or I will make sure that you are removed. Please respond to this point. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Relzap (talk • contribs) 15:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with the relevant policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and WP:NOR. Then, maybe, if you behave like a civil human being, we can discuss why your recent edits related to Blumenthal violate Misplaced Pages policy and resulted in the speedy deletion of your article. — MShabazz /_Stalk 16:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee motion regarding Malik Shabazz

In August 2015, the administrator privileges of Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) were revoked under the Level I desysop procedure, which is intended as a temporary measure. The Arbitration Committee has satisfied itself that the account was not compromised and that any ongoing disruption at the time has ceased. Accordingly, we affirm that Malik Shabazz may be resysopped at his request at any time.

Support

Callanecc, Casliber, Courcelles, DGG, Doug Weller, Drmies, GorillaWarfare, Kelapstick, Kirill Lokshin, Opabinia regalis

Not voting

DeltaQuad, Guerillero, Keilana, Salvio giuliano

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:43, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration Committee motion regarding Malik Shabazz

Cross-posted for the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 18:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Took only 300 years to restore a good name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

All-white jury

You have expressed an interest in this article. Any comments you might care to offer, regarding my edit suggestions, would be welcome. Gulbenk (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding me, Gulbenk. I had forgotten about it. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 20:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Malik Shabazz to label my edit as vandalism is an irresponsible act on your part. I shall pursue that further in the appropriate forum. There was a lengthy discussion on this matter, where I presented of reasoned argument for the edit. Gulbenk (talk) 21:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry you feel that way, but blanking the entire section, sources and all, suggests you didn't bother to read any of them, or my argument on the talk page. See WP:Vandalism#Blanking, illegitimate. — MShabazz /_Stalk 22:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Malik, it's good to see you back, but I'm going to have to strongly disagree with you on this particular point. I think you were right in every other respect, mind you, but as I see it, Gulbenk at worst made a mistake. He was trying to make the article better, according to his own interpretation of 'better'; he was not replacing paragraphs with "LOL GAY" or such. To this end, I have revdel'd the edit summary. DS (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)