| Revision as of 08:19, 25 October 2016 editSarahj2107 (talk | contribs)Administrators21,749 edits note← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:30, 25 October 2016 edit undoIzno (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Interface administrators, Administrators115,802 edits →Relisting: please reconsiderNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Relisting== | ==Relisting== | ||
| Hi Nordic Nightfury, thanks for your work at AfD. I just wanted to remind you that per ] AfDs should only be relisted if there is "only a few participants (including the nominator), and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy". Some of the ones you relisted today had enough participants to give a clear consensus (for example ], ] and ]). It's not a huge problem if they are relisted but it could unnecessarily clog up today's log. ] (]) 08:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC) | Hi Nordic Nightfury, thanks for your work at AfD. I just wanted to remind you that per ] AfDs should only be relisted if there is "only a few participants (including the nominator), and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy". Some of the ones you relisted today had enough participants to give a clear consensus (for example ], ] and ]). It's not a huge problem if they are relisted but it could unnecessarily clog up today's log. ] (]) 08:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :As well as ]. Please reconsider your relist. --] (]) 11:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:30, 25 October 2016
If my talk page is blank, please forgive it. I have everything archived.
Can I also ask anyone that I have posted a message to, please reply where I have posted it, as I will most likely track it on my Contribs or have watched the page. Many thanks. It also keeps everything in order and avoids confrontations. Thanks again.
To contact me, click here. Thankyou.
 Archives |
| No archives yet. |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Recent Keep and deletion review:
for Cymbal, you only considered the numbers of votes and nothing substantial about the discussions people made for keep except citing guidelines. You ignored the detail substantial reports made by contributors. The page has nothing to write except few lines, no where it can become Encyclopedic notable, even you can do research. on the contrary you relisting all where Delete vote and discussion is prominent. Keep vote and numbers are not the only criteria, we need to look into the detail discussions and efforts put by community to make Misplaced Pages notable and what really stands for. Merely counting vote and ignoring all things and relisting others where your vote logic is also prominent. I do not really see the point. Thanks. Just my views. this is the reason Misplaced Pages is flooded with spams and whole junk articles. We are making Misplaced Pages nothing more than Newspaper or PR host for such companies. Light2021 (talk) 08:11, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisting
Hi Nordic Nightfury, thanks for your work at AfD. I just wanted to remind you that per WP:RELIST AfDs should only be relisted if there is "only a few participants (including the nominator), and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy". Some of the ones you relisted today had enough participants to give a clear consensus (for example Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Donnabella Mortel (2nd nomination), Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bioregulatory medicine (2nd nomination) and ]). It's not a huge problem if they are relisted but it could unnecessarily clog up today's log. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- As well as Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Godville. Please reconsider your relist. --Izno (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)