Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:37, 11 December 2016

Replaceable fair use File:Murdabeatz.png

Thanks for uploading File:Murdabeatz.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Misplaced Pages. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1017 vs. The World

The article 1017 vs. The World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See WP:TOOSOON. No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hibachi for Lunch

Is Hibachi for Lunch a mixtape or an EP?? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: It was first released as a mixtape, and it is considered by many outlets that it was a mixtape so I think it's a mixtape. It was just rereleased as an EP JayPe (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 1017 vs. The World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1017 vs. The World is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/1017 vs. The World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Starboy

If you want the Starboy article to be protected, you had to request for protection at the Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

:)

I really like what you have created bro, keep it up! BDMA Beats (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@BDMA Beats: Appreciate the love man. JayPe (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

6LACK

I was actually gonna undo my edit and say my bad but you made the edit before me. Sorry JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: It's fine. BTW, Magnolia just mentioned us both on someone else's talk page, are you planning on responding? JayPe (talk) 2:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, after Lazer Brain's responses i will respond back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: Right there with you on that. JayPe (talk) 2:54, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)

Yo I was thinking on creating that new J. Cole album "4 Your Eyez Only". Wanna help create the page? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: I'll gladly help out with the article, but I think we should wait a day or two to do it as it might be taken down for the lack of information it has (see discussion below). JayPe (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I know that is why i will add information to it. I already made it 4 Your Eyez Only you can help with it too. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

The Return of East Atlanta Santa

This article should have been created at The Return of East Atlanta Santa, which already existed as a redirect. The article is not currently notable, so I've redirected it. Please wait until there are more sources, then recreate the content at the proper namespace. I think you are aware that an article with a capital O for "of" is not correct. Please do not create alternate namespaces just because the proper redirect you did not create already exists. Ss112 04:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ss112: I had more sources and information piled up, but I'll gladly wait for a better time to put it back up (probably later in the week). Some sources I read also had the capital O in Of for the title so I went with it. JayPe (talk) 4:41, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)

Fair enough, but please recreate it later in the week at the correct namespace per MOS:CAPS. Ss112 04:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hey, welcome back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: I realized now that the points I made earlier were uncalled for (and I got pissed off just like this editor), and I should cite my edit's from now on like you said. Feels good to be back. JayPe (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Glad to have you back, just be careful with your edits and cite your sources. :) JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop adding unsourced content to articles. For example, with this edit you added someone named "Welsh" to the track listing. Misplaced Pages:Verifiability is very clear about adding original research to articles. The readers of Misplaced Pages expect accurate content, and the way this is assured is by insisting that Misplaced Pages contributors verify the accuracy of their edits through a reliable source. Many editors make great efforts to source each of their edits. When you randomly add names to articles, you undermine the accuracy of the encyclopedia, and undermine the hard work of your fellow editors. You have been cautioned again and again about this, yet most of the edits you have made today have included unsourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: The "Welsh" you're probably referring to is "Jacob Welsh" (1/2 of The Hics). I know I said some harsh things to you and Laser brain and I'm sincerely sorry, but at this point I feel you're just nitpicking my edits to an absurd degree, even though every edit I've put up is sourced (besides the "minor" cleanups). It's one thing removing content with no source, but removing them with sources defeats the purpose of citing sources you know. JayPe (talk) 2:36, 11 December 2016 (UTC)