| Revision as of 17:36, 27 September 2006 editSdedeo (talk | contribs)5,246 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:02, 27 September 2006 edit undoSdedeo (talk | contribs)5,246 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ''Please'' post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! ] <small>(])</small> 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ''Please'' post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! ] <small>(])</small> 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| <s>After a couple of months contributing to[REDACTED] in various ways, I've found that it's no longer as much fun as before. I've decided to go on an extended wikibreak, and I wish everyone luck. ] <small>(])</small> 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)</s> I'm back, and working on ] again. I still have a great deal of faith in the[REDACTED] project. ] <small>(])</small> 22:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | <s>After a couple of months contributing to[REDACTED] in various ways, I've found that it's no longer as much fun as before. I've decided to go on an extended wikibreak, and I wish everyone luck. ] <small>(])</small> 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)</s> <s>I'm back, and working on ] again. I still have a great deal of faith in the[REDACTED] project. ] <small>(])</small> 22:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)</s> I have gone on another break; please see my user page for more discussion of this issue. ] <small>(])</small> 18:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: Allen reversion-- == | |||
| Two reasons, in a nutshell: | |||
| (1) whether Allen considers himself 'proud Jewish' can be put up to debate, on the basis of his own statements (he says he considers himself Presbyterian); and | |||
| (2) even with that aside, putting that info in the intro gave it undue weight. | |||
| The article's been subject to a neutrality challenge until just about a week ago, so editors tend to treat changes w/ vigilance -- if I hadn't made the rv, someone else would probably have done it within a couple of hours. --] 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi GGreeneVa -- it seems there was some confusion; I didn't put that edit in. It looks like a different edit I made (on a quote from Allen during ]) was mistakenly reverted by you, and then by another user. ] <small>(])</small> 22:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah -- hadn't even spotted that. My bad. --] 22:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::No worries. It's too bad, though, that it is getting increasingly difficult for people to contribute on articles like these in the usual wiki fashion. (I'm not criticising you here.) ] <small>(])</small> 22:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Adminship== | |||
| Sure, I'd accept a nomination. I went through a self-nom a few months back and was defeated by about a 50/50 vote. I'm a bit nervous about going through it again because I'm not sure that a supermajority of Wikipedians will understand the ongoing issues with which I'm involved. To wit, I was blocked a few weeks back by an administrator who was alerted to simmering (and still ongoing) dispute at ]. What's more, I'm involved in so many different contentious articles regarding science and pseudoscience that I believe there are some people who will vote against me out of principle (such as ] who basically did this the last time). I am of the opinion that adminship is irrelevant to this, though. What I would use admin tools for would be menial tasks. For example, it'd sure be nice to have rollback and the ability to speedy nonsense delete nonsense articles. Especially since I can't, for example, set up vandalproof at every computer I use. --] 23:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Great. I'll write something up. ] <small>(])</small> 23:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Let's cut this thing loose== | |||
| I'm going to withdraw. This is a waste of time. --] 17:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes. Again, sorry to have dragged you into it. ] <small>(])</small> 17:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:02, 27 September 2006
archive contains earlier material from the talk page; August 2005 -- February 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 20:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
archive2 contains earlier material from the talk page; March 2006 -- June 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
archive3 contains earlier material from the talk page; June 2006 -- September 2006. Sdedeo (tips) 22:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Please post new comments to the bottom of the talk page; I will almost always respond to comments on this page itself (makes comments easier to find -- I encourage you to do the same) so check back! Sdedeo (tips) 22:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
After a couple of months contributing to[REDACTED] in various ways, I've found that it's no longer as much fun as before. I've decided to go on an extended wikibreak, and I wish everyone luck. Sdedeo (tips) 01:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC) I'm back, and working on medcabal again. I still have a great deal of faith in the[REDACTED] project. Sdedeo (tips) 22:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC) I have gone on another break; please see my user page for more discussion of this issue. Sdedeo (tips) 18:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)