| Revision as of 12:56, 27 May 2017 editThe Diaz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,763 edits →May 2017: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:57, 27 May 2017 edit undoThe Diaz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,763 edits →May 2017: Fixed double signatureTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| == May 2017 == | == May 2017 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed content from ] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> |
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed content from ] without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> <span style="color:blue">'''THE DIAZ'''</span> <sup>] • ]</sup> 12:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:57, 27 May 2017
Hello, from a DR/N volunteer
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. Yashovardhan (talk) 05:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello NorthBySouthBaranof,
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 823 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
You removed one of my edits
For a lack of validity in the publication I posted - yet other sources in the page are from personal blogs... Care to explain why? If I cite a government source will you allow it? Feel free to sanction me away - I've yet to break a single rule in the Misplaced Pages court of law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swreynolds92 (talk • contribs) 18:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- User:Swreynolds92 Welcome to Misplaced Pages — you are new at editing, and you have leaped to insert yourself into a contentious, sensitive issue relating to a living person. Misplaced Pages is not a court; we are a collaborative Internet encyclopedia project. We have policies and standards for writing about living people and one of those is upholding high standards for sourcing of material. The Daily Mail does not have the reputation for fact-checking and accuracy required for such sourcing. Moreover, the issue you are editing has been rehashed several times and there is a standing consensus for the wording in question. If you wish to modify it, you will need reliable sources and consensus on the article talk page. I invite you to discuss your proposed changes in more detail on that page, and I will also warn you that making unsupported or poorly-supported claims about living people can and will lead to sanctions under the biographies of living persons policy. We are required to treat living people with sensitivity, fairness and neutrality. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Great to hear! When will Misplaced Pages start "requiring" to treat things with "neutrality." As far as I can see/read it's mostly a biased agenda. Am I missing something?
- If you have general questions about Misplaced Pages's policies, the place to ask about them would be the Village Pump for Policy. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Christine Fair
See Doug Weller talk 09:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Hello, I'm The Diaz. I noticed that you recently removed content from White genocide conspiracy theory without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. THE DIAZ 12:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)