| Revision as of 23:03, 4 October 2006 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 edits →[] & UFPJ membership: fmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:13, 4 October 2006 edit undoPravknight (talk | contribs)322 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==] & UFPJ membership== | ==] & UFPJ membership== | ||
| If CRESP is but one of more than 1,300 international and United States-based organizations that belong to UFPJ, that's hardly notable enough to include here, particularly when one notes that it was inserted with such strongly non-neutral language it was obvious the it was intended to ]: I've cleaned it up, but if it is to remain in the article some basis for why this is notable needs to be presented. ] 23:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | If CRESP is but one of more than 1,300 international and United States-based organizations that belong to UFPJ, that's hardly notable enough to include here, particularly when one notes that it was inserted with such strongly non-neutral language it was obvious the it was intended to ]: I've cleaned it up, but if it is to remain in the article some basis for why this is notable needs to be presented. ] 23:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| If it's accurate, so what? It shows CRESP's political biases. You don't think twice about accusing Christian Right figures of Dominionism. Non-neutral language, you don't seem to mind using non-neutral language in the items you post. | |||
| The language I used is indeed neutral, per ]. It's well sourced and NPOV compliant. Besides, you don't own the article.].--] 23:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:13, 4 October 2006
Poisoning the well & UFPJ membership
If CRESP is but one of more than 1,300 international and United States-based organizations that belong to UFPJ, that's hardly notable enough to include here, particularly when one notes that it was inserted with such strongly non-neutral language it was obvious the it was intended to poison the well: I've cleaned it up, but if it is to remain in the article some basis for why this is notable needs to be presented. FeloniousMonk 23:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
If it's accurate, so what? It shows CRESP's political biases. You don't think twice about accusing Christian Right figures of Dominionism. Non-neutral language, you don't seem to mind using non-neutral language in the items you post.
The language I used is indeed neutral, per WP:WTA. It's well sourced and NPOV compliant. Besides, you don't own the article.WP:OWN.--Pravknight 23:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)