Revision as of 20:13, 25 August 2017 editLegacypac (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers158,031 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 25 August 2017 edit undoHasteur (talk | contribs)31,857 edits ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:'''Merge & Redirect & Protect''' to ] as a syntaticaly similar name is revealed in the external links. If the author of the page wishes to expand coverage of the topic, they may do it on the mainspace article page. ] (]) 20:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | :'''Merge & Redirect & Protect''' to ] as a syntaticaly similar name is revealed in the external links. If the author of the page wishes to expand coverage of the topic, they may do it on the mainspace article page. ] (]) 20:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
::"syntaticaly similar" doesn't mean identical. The topic is notable and the page is otherwise free of problematic content; so there is no need to delete it. -- ] (]) 20:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | ::"syntaticaly similar" doesn't mean identical. The topic is notable and the page is otherwise free of problematic content; so there is no need to delete it. -- ] (]) 20:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::It doesn't have to be identical. The Merged to article does need to have some mention of the topic. For this reason your argument is lacking in any standing in my eyes. ] (]) 20:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
::::with no meaningful content or lots of sources, how can we tell if it is notable. I've become convinced these stubs are not actually notable but are just part of a larger topic. ] (]) 20:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | ::::with no meaningful content or lots of sources, how can we tell if it is notable. I've become convinced these stubs are not actually notable but are just part of a larger topic. ] (]) 20:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
*'''Close/technical fix''': I agree the tilte needs to be corrected; why is MfD a place for such a discussion? -- ] (]) 20:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC) | *'''Close/technical fix''': I agree the tilte needs to be corrected; why is MfD a place for such a discussion? -- ] (]) 20:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:14, 25 August 2017
Draft:Quantum enveloping algebra (2)
Page created because the original little draft was moved to the Userspace of the creator. Instead of undoing the redirect at the first title and seeking deletion of the userspace page, this (2) title was created. Two attempts at a G6 technical deletion have been reversed, so I bring it to MfD. Legacypac (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Merge & Redirect & Protect to Quantum group as a syntaticaly similar name is revealed in the external links. If the author of the page wishes to expand coverage of the topic, they may do it on the mainspace article page. Hasteur (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- "syntaticaly similar" doesn't mean identical. The topic is notable and the page is otherwise free of problematic content; so there is no need to delete it. -- Taku (talk) 20:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be identical. The Merged to article does need to have some mention of the topic. For this reason your argument is lacking in any standing in my eyes. Hasteur (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- with no meaningful content or lots of sources, how can we tell if it is notable. I've become convinced these stubs are not actually notable but are just part of a larger topic. Legacypac (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be identical. The Merged to article does need to have some mention of the topic. For this reason your argument is lacking in any standing in my eyes. Hasteur (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- "syntaticaly similar" doesn't mean identical. The topic is notable and the page is otherwise free of problematic content; so there is no need to delete it. -- Taku (talk) 20:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Close/technical fix: I agree the tilte needs to be corrected; why is MfD a place for such a discussion? -- Taku (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- because you twice reverted my attempts to clean up the redirect mess you created. Legacypac (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- No you attempted to covertly delete the page by moving it to my user page. I'm trying to fix that. -- Taku (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- your userspace is an excellent place for something you might work on someday. People keep telling yiu that but per your userpage, you see it as giving in to deletionists (June 2016) Legacypac (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- because you twice reverted my attempts to clean up the redirect mess you created. Legacypac (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)