Misplaced Pages

User talk:MarioProtIV: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:25, 28 August 2017 editProkaryotes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,246 edits Your fringe claim at Hurricane Harvey: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 18:11, 28 August 2017 edit undoProkaryotes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,246 edits Your fringe claim at Hurricane Harvey: ARB alert for cc topicTag: contentious topics alertNext edit →
Line 113: Line 113:


Hello MarioProtIV, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, . Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Misplaced Pages administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing ] associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. ] (]) 17:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Hello MarioProtIV, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, . Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Misplaced Pages administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing ] associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. ] (]) 17:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 18:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:11, 28 August 2017


Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2


Reverting edits

I understand that your issue is that you want to use artist depictions in astronomy infoboxes. Why can't you just do that. Why do you have to revert ALL my edits ????? And then archive discussions out of sight. Do you have a bee in your bonnet or are you genuinely interested in Misplaced Pages as a collaborative project ?--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 02:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2


Reverting edits

I understand that your issue is that you want to use artist depictions in astronomy infoboxes. Why can't you just do that. Why do you have to revert ALL my edits ????? And then archive discussions out of sight. Do you have a bee in your bonnet or are you genuinely interested in Misplaced Pages as a collaborative project ?--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 02:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@MarioProtIV: May I ask why you archived EvenGreenerFish's earlier post on your talk page without responding to it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I was a bit busy and I must've forgotten to respond when I archived it. Sorry about that. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 12:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017 storms

I think this is a different weather system. Starting April 23, we had a lot of rain in North and South Carolina and the flooding is quite serious if you compare the river levels in this article to Hurricane Matthew. I seem to recall tornadoes with this system too. How we do it other than going to the person who did most of the edits I don't know, but it seems there are two systems which can have their own articles in April 2017, or perhaps two systems that could be part of one article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware the April 23 system didn't have that much tornadoes but for the flooding it may need an article in the future, IMO. Would just have to get some consensus from higher up people for that. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 19:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
The tornadoes may have been a separate system.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Now that I remember there was another system that produced tornadoes in the South before the one we are dealing with currently came in. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 19:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
@MarioProtIV: I can understand why you removed some of my edits since I'm new here but one of the EF0 tornadoes from edit 778063642 was removed as well as another EF0 that needs to be added in. WeatherDudeEF5 (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
If there are more storms today we may have to move the article to a new name that includes May. Maybe the old title can apply to the system from last week.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
The tornadoes from yesterday and Saturday were part of the same system that produced the floods in the Central US over the weekend. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 15:39, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Keep in mind the flooding occurring right now in the Carolinas is from rain that fell last Sunday, Monday and Tuesday. I'm sure that's a separate system from what is causing problems now. I fast-forwarded through the local news last night and the damage that I could see even then was pretty bad. I assume those are the tornadoes you are referring to.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Just got finished looking at some real newspapers. No references to tornadoes. I'll work on the Carolinas flooding and see how we can get that into an article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Here is more on that.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Another storm system?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:00, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Re: Revert Hurricane Opal

There was a discussion that took place in regards to a similar situation in a different article. Basically, it was discussed whether or not a section showing the most intense tropical cyclones by category should be included in the article List of Atlantic hurricane records. For example, Hurricane Alex of 2010 was the most intense Category 2 hurricane, with a pressure of 946 mbar, Isidore the most intense Category 3 hurricane (934 mbar), Opal (916 mbar), and Wilma (882 mbar). This is an analagous situation, and even though Opal was the most intense Category 4 Atlantic hurricane, there seem to be no sources which state this verbatim. The link to the full discussion is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Undescribed&oldid=777849061 --Undescribed (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

2010–11 North American winter

--Anonymous Ryan (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC) I completed the article for the 2010-2011 winter season. This page was created by the user "master of time" I added the events and seasonal forcast sections.

Stephanie

Can you please stop creating an article for Stephanie and respect the consensus formed at ]. Otherwise you may find yourself being blocked from editing.Jason Rees (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

That consensus was only because the unofficial name was used for the page name. I didn't use that title, rather I used it in a format similar to 2006 Central Pacific cyclone. Please take it to the page's talk page before jumping to conclusions. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 16:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Mario, I would also say you should stop using the "Reverted good faith edits by..." option of Twinkle for edits by experienced editors. Since experienced editors know to assume the assumption of good faith, it could be viewed as condescending. This revert option is mostly intended for well-intentioned but misguided edits by new users. I recommend "restore this revision" instead if you need to. Even then, your conduct in this particular case was heading towards edit warring. Please do heed the warning @Juliancolton: gave you last month, or we may have to consider restrictions on your ability to edit here, which we would stringently prefer not to do.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Got it, will try to keep it cool with both that and the GF edits. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 19:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
I know it's annoying when we revert, merge, or change your contributions, but that's only because have a solid hold on project standards, and because we all went through our own trail/error phase too. Take this barnstar for being on top of all things Wiki for both severe weather and tropical cyclones, and for not giving up on us yet. ;) TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 02:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Arlene

For the record I am fine with having an article if editors agree to it via a second discussion on the matter. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Went ahead and started new discussion. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 15:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
I saw that you had worked on the draft. I want to thank you for your hard work in trying, but we have to respect the other members of the project as well regardless of the outcome. This is how it is sometimes, I hope you aren't discouraged. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Tornado outbreak and floods of April 28 – May 1, 2017) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tornado outbreak and floods of April 28 – May 1, 2017, MarioProtIV!

Misplaced Pages editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 22:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Other system

Please refrain from creating a level 2 header called "Other systems", with level 3 headers of "Tropical depression", as it defeats the purpose of having one altogether. The purpose of an other systems section is for systems that are either a) not officially warned on or b) (and this mostly applies to older systems) doesn't really have much information, so giving it a full blown section would lead to excess whitespace. Regards. YE 20:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

TD Cindy

What the storm's winds are is irrelevant to whether we continue to display information. Remember that unlike all the other categories, tropical depression does not have a lower bound. Cindy is still an active tropical cyclone according to the WPC. As long as that is the case, we display information. If you disagree with that, you're free to bring it up on the project page, but I don't think you'll have much luck given what I've told you above. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 21:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Isaac

Do you think Hurricane Isaac in 2012 can be a primary topic? --219.79.127.186 (talk) 02:05, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

@219.78.127.186: Possibly, but considering it was overshadowed by Sandy, I'm holding back on it a bit. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 16:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Could we possibly avoid having so many requested moves/page moves just to knock the year off and make something the primary topic. It isnt like the world is going to end just because the article for the name Isacc has the 2012 on it, lets just use some common sense with this stuff please.Jason Rees (talk) 17:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Given that the 82 incarnation of Isaac is one of the worst Tonga cyclones, I'd say no. YE 23:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Dora image

Hey, there. Me and @ChocolateTrain: have discussed regarding to the Hurricane Dora image situation that has been going on (see User talk:Typhoon2013#Hurricane Dora image). ChocolateTrain's image is pretty acceptable in my opinion and he did discussed the "goods and the bads" of our versions. Typhoon2013 (talk) 21:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Lester 2016

Do you think we need an article for Lester in 2016, as it was one of the two tropical cyclones to threaten a direct hit on the Big Island? --219.79.181.53 (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Suomi Images

Please stop reverting my edit images. The Suomi-NPP images I made are much better than their previous ones. Especially, please make an explanation to your edit summary containing why. I have reverted your edits and have uploaded more Suomi images. Typhoon2013 (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Naval Research Laboratory

G'day MarioProtIV. I have a question about how to do something, and as I have seen you do it before, I thought you'd be the one to ask. How do you get colour images from the Naval Research Laboratory page? You got our recent image for Hurricane Harvey from there, but all I can ever get is black-and-white images. No matter what I press, I never get colour. Could you give me some instructions on how to get a colour image? For example, how do you get to the image you uploaded to Commons from the page I linked above? Thanks. ChocolateTrain (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Ask Supportstorm (talk · contribs) for that, I just ask for requests. --MarioProtIV (/contribs) 05:22, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Supportstorm adds color to the black-and-white images after the matter. Master of Time (talk) 07:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Hurricane Katrina

Why are you reverting the text I added to the lead? It is unencyclopedic to start an article mentioning the subject's importance without first properly describing it. For example, the Jeff Bezos article does not begin with, "Jeff Bezos is the richest man in the world." The article had a proper lead until you changed it on 29 October 2016. Pristino (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Your fringe claim at Hurricane Harvey

Hello MarioProtIV, I've noticed that you removed well sourced content at the article, with the notice, rm global warming stuff as it usually is just bolstered by CNN (e.g may be approaching WP:FRINGE), tweak some other stuff. Notice, that The Arbitration Committee has permitted Misplaced Pages administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor editing global warming associated pages. Read more about discretionary sanctions https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions If you want to discuss page edits, start a new section on the article talk page. prokaryotes (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 prokaryotes (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

User talk:MarioProtIV: Difference between revisions Add topic